No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 8, 2012

    Portland General Electric Company v. Ebasco Services, Inc. (2012)

    …and vacated the supplemental fee judgment in favor of Portland General Electric. A court lacks jurisdiction to enter a default judgment for more than the amount prayed for in the complaint unless the defaulting party had…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 27, 2024

    Craft v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)

    The Louisiana Fourth Circuit granted Climmie Craft's writ application, reversed the trial court's rulings limiting her industrial hygiene expert Kenneth Garza to general opinions, and remanded, ruling against the defendants (Ports America Gulfport, Crowley…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)

    …It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Lebeau v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    … to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[66\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be strictly construed in favor of remand, the Federal Officer Removal statute's language must be liberally…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)

    …the Plan B Settlement as the default, or fallback, settlement in the event that the court could not approve the Plan A Settlement.\[11\] Debtors' former General Counsel, John Gasparovic, testified that during "the negotiations of…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2005)

    …however, rule out the desirability of considering trends general to the industry, particularly regarding the rate of filing of claims. The total number of claims to be expected should be estimated. The estimation of claims should…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…