No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 8, 2012

    Portland General Electric Company v. Ebasco Services, Inc. (2012)

    …and vacated the supplemental fee judgment in favor of Portland General Electric. A court lacks jurisdiction to enter a default judgment for more than the amount prayed for in the complaint unless the defaulting party had…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    RW Beckett Corp. v. Allianz Global Corp. (2020)

    …which was in effect from February 1, 1981, through February 1, 1984, included comprehensive general liability coverage. ECF Doc. 1-5 at 1, 37. The policy set an aggregate bodily injury limit of $500,000 and…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 27, 2024

    Craft v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)

    The Louisiana Fourth Circuit granted Climmie Craft's writ application, reversed the trial court's rulings limiting her industrial hygiene expert Kenneth Garza to general opinions, and remanded, ruling against the defendants (Ports America Gulfport, Crowley…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983

    Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)

    …and multiple-level hearsay from a doctor's report, a general pamphlet and an unsupported 'admission' that brake linings contain asbestos does not supply it. Medical opinions based on statistical studies can be substantial evidence of…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)

    …2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)

    …It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Lebeau v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    … to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[66\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be strictly construed in favor of remand, the Federal Officer Removal statute's language must be liberally…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  10. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …without the insurer's consent to the terms of settlement. Such terms again are a justifiable incident of the insurers' general right to manage the processing of claims; they reflect insurers' understandable interest in containing their…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jeter v. Ameron International Corporation (2021)

    …L.L.C. ("Turner"). Turner filed a third-party demand against its comprehensive general liability insurers, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company ("FFIC") and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G"), seeking that they provide Turner…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 10, 1991 · in the opinion

    Force v. Director, Owcp, Dept. of Labor (1991)

    …S.Ct. at 2289, which "expressly creates a general right of reimbursement that obtains without regard to whether the employee's third-party recovery includes losses that are excluded from FECA coverage." Id. at 174, 104…

  15. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…