No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 8, 2012

    Portland General Electric Company v. Ebasco Services, Inc. (2012)

    …and vacated the supplemental fee judgment in favor of Portland General Electric. A court lacks jurisdiction to enter a default judgment for more than the amount prayed for in the complaint unless the defaulting party had…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)

    …Yes. Westinghouse and General Electric Turbines.\[38\] Plaintiffs also offer the following testimony to show that Cortez worked on Westinghouse turbines and handled asbestos gaskets while working on the turbine's flanges: Q. You talked about…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 8, 2015

    Savoie v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. (2015)

    Joseph Savoie sued in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, state court in August 2014, alleging he contracted mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working for Avondale (now Huntington Ingalls) from about 1948 to 1996. He alleged daily exposure at the job…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 27, 2024

    Craft v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)

    The Louisiana Fourth Circuit granted Climmie Craft's writ application, reversed the trial court's rulings limiting her industrial hygiene expert Kenneth Garza to general opinions, and remanded, ruling against the defendants (Ports America Gulfport, Crowley…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 12, 2022

    Boutte v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2022)

    …adopted allegations identified the workplaces, that missing job and date details could be learned in discovery, and that McDermott could simply deny the general paragraphs that did not apply to it. The pleading was not unintelligible.

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)

    …It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Lebeau v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    … to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[66\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be strictly construed in favor of remand, the Federal Officer Removal statute's language must be liberally…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Gomez v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2024)

    …and failure to enact safety measures while this case, in addition to those claims, also involves claims for general negligence and strict liability. While Avondale is correct, Gomez's motion only seeks summary judgment as to…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Blouin v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2017)

    …¶ 11. Plaintiffs do not take issue with the foregoing general allegations. But given that their claims pertain to Avondale's failure to warn of the hazards of asbestos and failure to implement any of the known…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…