- Organization: Certain underwriters at Lloyd's, London
- Organization: Old Republic Insurance Company
- Clear filters
7 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)
…in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)
…that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2024
Matherne v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2024)
…its insurers from asserting the government contractor defense (Boyle/Yearsley). The plaintiffs did not seek judgment on the strict liability or general negligence claims. Failure to Warn; Government Contractor Defense and Removal Worksites: Avondale Shipyards (main…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)
As a general principle, a clause restricting assignment does not in any way limit the policyholder's power to make an assignment of the rights under the policy — consisting of the right to receive the proceeds…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion
Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)
§ 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…
-
Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion
RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)
…and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion
US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)
…coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…