No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

    Twenty asbestos companies, acting together as the Center for Claims Resolution, and class counsel agreed to settle the asbestos injury claims of a nationwide class estimated at 250,000 to 2,000,000 people. The class included people with…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007 · in the opinion

    Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)

    …Co., Industrial Holdings Corp; Union Carbide Corp., Amchem Products, Inc., CertainTeed Corp., Foseco, Inc., and Carborundum Co., Inc. Roetzel & Andress, Susan Squire Box, and Brad A. Rimmel, for appellee Mobil Corporation. Oldham & Dowling, Reginald S. Kramer…

  3. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 1997 · in the opinion

    Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor (1997)

    … T & N, PLC; Union Carbide Corp.; and United States Gypsum Co. All of the CCR petitioners stopped manufacturing asbestos products around 1975. \[3\] It is basic to comprehension of this proceeding to notice that no transferred…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1994)

    …Inc., Quigley Company, Inc., Shook & Fletcher Insulation Company, T & N plc, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Corp., United States Gypsum Company. \[4\] For example, on or about February 25, 1994, Vincent and Georgia Betty Greco, members…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998 · in the opinion

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    …testified that Owens-Illinois, before it merged with Owens Corning Fiberglass Company, manufactured fiberglass pipe covering which was sold to the Asbestos Workers Union. This fiberglass pipe covering did not cause lung cancer, but the workers…

  6. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989 · in the opinion

    District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)

    …of actions commenced by a state after a statute of limitations would ordinarily have run.\[11\] The District of Columbia, however, has never been admitted to the Union as a state. The District is, of course…