No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 25, 2019

    Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc. (2019)

    …Texaco, Emerson Electric and General Electric, and granted Goulds and ITT's motion only as to the Soliz survival claim (barred by the earlier dismissal) while denying it as to the Soliz wrongful death claims. Under…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion

    Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …Inc.; Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc.; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; and Western Electric Corporation (now Viacom, Inc.) for damages allegedly sustained as a result of Mr. Breaux's exposure to asbestos. Plaintiffs allege their damages, including Mr. Breaux's…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)

    …California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal.5th 391, 397 \[247 Cal.Rptr.3d 632, 441 P.3d 881\].) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)

    …refinery, including Standard Oil of New Jersey's employee Paul Kuhl, who became general manager of the refinery. Soler testified as the person most qualified for the Chevron defendants in Sabetian v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)

    …391, 397; accord, Sabetian, supra, 57 Cal.App.5th at p. 1070.) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 619; accord…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Hsieh v. Apache Deepwater, LLC (2021)

    2008) (citation omitted) ("When faced with general objections, the applicability of which to specific document requests is not explained further, this Court will not raise objections for the responding party, but instead will overrule the responding…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 4, 2016

    South v. Texaco (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …understood his 1997 release covered a future mesothelioma claim, and ordered plaintiff's counsel to disclose the settlement amount. Under the Jones Act and general maritime law, the party relying on a seaman's release bears…

  8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021

    Wright v. 3M Company (2021)

    …settlement reasonableness hearing because the settling parties never provided the full settlement agreements. An owner does not retain control over an independent contractor's work merely by requiring compliance with safety laws and general safety rules…

  9. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 9, 2024 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Texaco, Inc. (2024)

    …So.3d 726, 735 (Providing that tort immunity under the borrowed employee doctrine is an affirmative defense.). The general rule is that affirmative defenses are waived if not specifically pled in the answer. La. C.C…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)

    … 2778, subds. 3 & 4.) "\[Civil Code\] section 2778, unchanged since 1872, sets forth general rules for the interpretation of indemnity contracts, \unless a contrary intention appears.' If not forbidden by other, more specific, statutes, the obligations…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · August 29, 2017 · in the opinion

    South v. Chevron Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)

    …276 \[2011\] \[internal quotation marks omitted\]). Because the subject release is governed by the law applicable to Jones Act claims and general maritime law, the responsibility is Texaco's to establish the enforceability of the release…