10 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion
Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…Fiberboard Corp.; Johns-Manville Sales Corp.; Philip Carey Corp.; Owens-Corning Fiberglass Company; and Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. as well. Plaintiffs settled the Texas litigation with all defendants except North American Refractories. Following jury trial, the jury…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · October 18, 1989 · in the opinion
Vaughn v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc. (1989)
…exposure to the asbestos in Foster Wheeler boilers was a substantial factor in causing Vaughn's mesothelioma. See Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162 (4th Cir.1986).\[2\] The Shipowners' position is…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion
Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)
…Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: GERRY L. ALEXANDER, C.J., and CHARLES W. JOHNSON, SUSAN OWENS, BARBARA A. MADSEN, MARY E. FAIRHURST, RICHARD B. SANDERS…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021
Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)
…defendants, holding they owed no duty of care to Khosravan, and awarded respondents their costs on appeal. A defendant owes no duty to protect workers from asbestos at premises it did not own, possess or control…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc. (2019)
…an obligation is owed to multiple persons, the obligation is severable, such that a tortfeasor owes a separate performance to each member of a class of beneficiaries entitled to bring a wrongful death claim. La. Civ…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2019
Malek v. Chevron U.S.A. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)
…was not a joint venturer or principal of the operator, and did not undertake responsibility for worker safety owes no duty of care; workers who only incidentally benefit from a contract are not intended third party…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020
Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)
…favor of the Exxon defendants. A defendant that did not own, possess or control the premises owes no premises or negligence duty to workers there, and a guarantee in a contract not intended to benefit the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 25, 2022 · in the opinion
EL Paso Energy Est Company v. Chevron USA Inc. (2022)
…El Paso's defense costs in that suit. (Dkt. 41 at p. 4). "\[A\]s Chevron owes no duty to defend El Paso, it, a fortiori, has no duty to indemnify it." (Dkt. 41 at p…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion
Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)
…to the plaintiff nor sits in a relation to the parties that creates an affirmative duty to protect the plaintiff from harm. . . the defendant owes no legal duty to the plaintiff." (Brown, at p. 216; accord…