9 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…causation where there are many possible sources of asbestos exposure, jurisdictions have fashioned different causation standards: "1) the California Supreme Court's \exposure-to-risk' test of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion
Assenzio v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2015)
…2012, prior to the May 28, 2013 commencement date of the trial. As to Owens Illinois in Assenzio, plaintiffs contend they provided information that Mr. Assenzio claimed exposure to asbestos from its products, in responses to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a "legal cause" of his injury — i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…Hayes, Lipe Automation Corp., Lucas Variety Automotive Holdings Co., Mack Trucks, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Navistar, Inc., Owens Illinois, Inc., Pneumo Abex Corp., Riley Power, Inc., Todd Shipyards Corp., Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…Brooks now moves for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' products liability and negligence claims contending it owes no duty to warn or duty of care to Plaintiffs.\[2\] The Court has addressed by…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 14, 2015 · in the opinion
Ricci v. Cleaver-Brooks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…that the moving defendant's predecessors worked on the site doing the type of work that plaintiff observed\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Rosen v. Genuine Parts Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state (CPLR § 302\[a\]\[1\]…