13 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020 · in the opinion
Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)
…1. Plaintiffs argue there is no evidence that a product sold by Owens Corning Fiberglass should be attributed to Owens-Illinois. Plaintiffs aver that any suggestion that such an attribution should be made was merely attorney…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)
…more than the presence of asbestos in the workplace; he must prove that he worked in the vicinity of the product's use. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622 (Pa. Super…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 29, 2023 · in the opinion
Ragusa v. Louisiana Guaranty Insurance Association (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…entitled to summary judgment. Products Liability — Duty to Warn Plaintiffs' products liability claim is foreclosed by Tenth Circuit precedent applying Oklahoma law. In Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 965 F.2d 844, 847 (10th Cir.
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 14, 2015 · in the opinion
Ricci v. Cleaver-Brooks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…that the moving defendant's predecessors worked on the site doing the type of work that plaintiff observed\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · July 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)
…accord). The Court finds guidance, however, in Tenth Circuit authority applying Oklahoma law. In Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 965 F.2d 844, 847 (10th Cir. 1992) (Rohrbaugh I), the Tenth Circuit held that the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2017 · in the opinion
All Craft Fabricators, Inc. v. Atc Assoc., Inc. (2017)
…THE MANHATTAN COMPANY OF NEW YORK LLC, UNITED STATES PLYWOOD CORPORATION, CHAMPION INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC., DAP PRODUCTS, INC., MASONITE CORPORATION, INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY and OWENS- ILLINOIS, INC., Defendant. Docket No. 156897/13…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · September 4, 2002 · in the opinion
Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc. (2002)
…area by analogizing this case to the case of Owens v. Martin, 449 So.2d 448 (La.1984), which is distinguishable on a crucial point, that is, Owens predicated the running of prescription and the corresponding…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion
Assenzio v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2015)
…2012, prior to the May 28, 2013 commencement date of the trial. As to Owens Illinois in Assenzio, plaintiffs contend they provided information that Mr. Assenzio claimed exposure to asbestos from its products, in responses to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion
Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a "legal cause" of his injury — i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 3, 2012 · in the opinion
Calewarts v. CR Meyer and Sons Company (2012)
…case. It contends the doctrine cannot apply to a safe place violation by a property owner because such claims are not "independent from and unrelated to" the safe place duty the employer also owes the employee…