No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

24 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    Two long-time employees of the American Cyanamid plant, Robert Sholtis and Sam Lee, sued asbestos manufacturers and suppliers. Sholtis died at 65 of pleural asbestosis. He had worked as a mill operator, maintenance laborer, pipefitter's helper and…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020

    Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    …may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits on reconsideration with late evidence) leave no reasonable possibility of reinstating the claim; the common-defense exception does not apply where the reason…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 23, 1994

    Busfield v. AC & S., Inc. (1994)

    Alva Busfield and his wife sued many asbestos companies. A jury found that Busfield had an asbestos-related disease, asymptomatic asbestosis or pleural thickening, but that it caused him no harm. The opinion does not describe where or how he was…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2003 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. John Crane, Inc. (2003)

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 985, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 103, 928 P.2d 1181 (Richards) that controls here. In Richards, the Supreme Court had occasion to consider the interplay between Proposition 51 and…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …a preponderance of the evidence that in reasonable medical probability, this exposure was a substantial factor contributing to \[Cadlo's\] risk of developing the disease." "Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)

    …for summary judgment, plaintiffs have either moved to dismiss or settled with the following defendants which were party to the Joint Defendants' motion: FMC Corporation,\[20\] Ingersoll-Rand Company,\[21\] McCarty Corporation,\[22\] Owens-Illinois, Inc.…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Assenzio v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2015)

    …2012, prior to the May 28, 2013 commencement date of the trial. As to Owens Illinois in Assenzio, plaintiffs contend they provided information that Mr. Assenzio claimed exposure to asbestos from its products, in responses to…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …new 2003). We have reviewed the instructions given to the jury and conclude that there was no error. Our Supreme Court addressed the issue of causation in asbestos cases in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · February 16, 2016 · in the opinion

    Walashek v. Air Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)

    …medical probability that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a "legal cause" of his injury — i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …190 Cal.App.4th at p. 33.) Appellants rely on Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461 (Sparks) and Stewart to argue that John Crane did not bear its burden of providing…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)

    …285). A. Threshold Exposure Plaintiff's claims require proof that Defendant caused or contributed to Donald Willis's exposure to asbestos. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975 (1997) ("\[P\]laintiffs \[bear\] the…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)

    821 Moreover, the plaintiff must show "the manufacturer's asbestos product was used at the specific site within the workplace where \[the plaintiff\] worked." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in the scope of \[the plaintiffs\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571 N.W.2d 530, 533 (Mich…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Vanhooser v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2012)

    …difficult to determine when the injury occurs and "\[n\]o temporally discrete event exists that encompasses the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1977) 16 Cal.4th 520…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Oklahoma · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Bootenhoff v. Hormel Foods Corporation (2014)

    …Brooks now moves for judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' products liability and negligence claims contending it owes no duty to warn or duty of care to Plaintiffs.\[2\] The Court has addressed by…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 14, 2015 · in the opinion

    Ricci v. Cleaver-Brooks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …that the moving defendant's predecessors worked on the site doing the type of work that plaintiff observed\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021

    Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…