No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

24 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 15, 2014

    Estate OF Gregovich v. Auer Steel & Heating Supply (2014)

    George Gregovich alleged that asbestos from products made or supplied by sixteen defendants caused his mesothelioma. He died about eighteen months after filing suit, and his estate and a guardian of his person and estate continued the case. The…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 10, 2019

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    Sherri Deem sued on her own behalf and for the estate of her husband, Thomas Deem, who worked at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard from 1974 to 1981 as an apprentice and journeyman outside machinist. The complaint alleged he was exposed to…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 25, 2015 · in the opinion

    Smith v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2015)

    …yard brought claims against General Electric ("GE") after PCB-contaminated oil leaked out of discarded GE electrical components onto their land. The court held that "the dismantling and processing of junk electrical components was not a…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …Pump Division, FMC CORPORATION, sued as successor of Northern Pumps and Peerless Pumps, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY a/k/a NAPA, sued individually and d/b/a Rayloc Brakes, GRINNELL, LLC…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …retain an expert in every finished product manufacturer's line of business and second-guess the finished product manufacturer whenever any of its employees received any information about any potential problems.'" (Artiglio v. General Electric Co.

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …retain an expert in every finished product manufacturer's line of business and second-guess the finished product manufacturer whenever any of its employees received any information about any potential problems.'" (Artiglio v. General Electric Co.

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …specifications does not deprive them of the component parts defense. In Artiglio v. General Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 817\], the defendant manufactured silicone in accordance with "particular specifications…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. American Standard, Inc. (2009)

    …difficult if not impossible, is irrelevant to the determination whether the forum is suitable unless \the alternative forum provides no remedy at all.' \[Citations.\]" (Guimei v. General Electric Co. (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 689, 696.)…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Abbay v. Aurora Pump Company (2011)

    …successor-in-interest to PEERLESS PUMP COMPANY and CHICAGO PUMP COMPANY); FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to DELPHI HARRISON THERMAL SYSTEM and HARRISON RADIATOR); IMO INDUSTRIES, INC…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2015 · in the opinion

    Assenzio v. Burnham (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …Nutmeg Technologies, Inc., 43 AD3d 599, 602 \[3rd Dept 2007\]). The link between asbestos and disease, general causation, is well documented. In re New York Asbestos Litigation (Marshall), 28 AD3d 255 (1st Dept. 2006). The First…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 14, 2015 · in the opinion

    Ricci v. Cleaver-Brooks (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …mechanical engineer (Tr at 138). He testified that while working at Joseph Loring, the company was busy designing and developing systems, electrical, sprinklers, plumbing and air conditioning for hospitals, schools and other facilities in New York…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 30, 2015

    Assenzio v. AO Smith Water Prods. (2015)

    …court overlooked or misapplied law, and renewal requires new facts or a change in law; a pending appeal and a judgment-molding calculation under General Obligations Law § 15-108 do not qualify. The court may still…

  13. Court case · Alabama Supreme Court · December 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    Bradberry v. Carrier Corporation ET AL. (2011)

    \[8\] An exception to the general rule that the automatic stay does not apply to solvent codefendants has been recognized in certain "unusual circumstances" that are not present in this case. See A.H. Robbins Co…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 1, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Peter & Elpis Constantinides v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …125-8). Defendant asserts that this is a general, speculative statement and is insufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact. While it is true that Plaintiffs' expert does not directly controvert Defendant's expert…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010 · in the opinion

    Davis v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2010)

    …user defense, the ordinary users would have been Davis's employers, not Davis. As support, appellants cite Maneely v. General Motors Corp. (9th Cir. 1997) 108 F.3d 1176. In Maneely, applying California law, the court…

  17. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)

    …NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to GARLOCK, INC. and US GASKET CO.); GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARDIE-TYNES, LLC. (sued…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion

    Lamberty v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2014)

    …percent sure. It was either — he came in on the entry level. It would be either power plant helper or assistant general mechanic. I'm not exactly sure which one. Q So he worked under you?…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Harris v. Ajax Boiler, Inc. (2014)

    …the overhaul of any of the defendants' boilers. Plaintiff has no evidence to show that defendants' boilers required the use of an asbestos-containing cement, in general, or Narcolite in particular, to affect a proper repair…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · July 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hartfield v. 3M Company (2016)

    …however, because she did not allege that the dealership had knowledge of the defect when it sold the car and state law did not impose on the dealership a general post-sale duty to warn. Id…