8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2018
Hooper-Lynch v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…New York, transacts business here with an articulable nexus to the claim, supporting specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) even though there is no general jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction user of cosmetic talc powder 1968-1985
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 22, 2016
Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
… plaintiffs had not excluded other possible causes; its talc was asbestos-free; and there was no proof of general or specific causation. The court denied the motion. Whether her earlier chest pain and pleural effusions were…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2012)
…June 2, 2011. \[3\] 21 U.S.C.A. § 379s, entitled "Preemption for labeling or packaging of cosmetics," provides: (a) In general. Except as provided in subsection (b), (d), or (e) of this section, no State…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Smith v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
… 12-15) Thus, none of these Defendants are subject to general jurisdiction in Alabama. \[4\] Plaintiff also takes issue with Downey's reliance on a summary of sales records he was given prior to his deposition…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · March 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Kirkwood v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2020)
…avoid jurisdiction." In re Nazi Era Cases, 153 F. App'x at 823. While product line successor liability\[2\] is an exception to the general rule of successor non-liability, "no court, appears to have addressed ..…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…limiting products liability actions against nonmanufacturing sellers. Section 82.003 established a general rule that a nonmanufacturing seller is not liable for harm caused by a defective product. This limitation was enacted to protect "innocent sellers…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 1, 2023 · in the opinion
Chenet v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2023)
…misplaced. Unlike in Thomas, the trial court judge made only a general statement regarding potential appellate court reversal —the trial court commented that this court had reversed his prior decisions in other unrelated cases. Likewise, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion
LaFLAIR v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…thus requiring the Court to interpret each allegation as against Kolmar individually. While these "general allegation\[s\] would arguably be insufficient under federal pleading standards, the question at this stage is whether Plaintiff\['s\] pleadings are…