64 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 4
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · October 22, 2021
Lindsey v. Dow Chemical Company (2021)
Kris Lindsey, a Florida citizen diagnosed with mesothelioma in September 2020, sued twelve companies in a St. Louis state court. His amended petition alleged he was exposed to asbestos from Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, used on him as an infant and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 26, 2023 · in the opinion
Simoneaux v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2023)
…Kelsey Eagan, Magali Ann Puente-Martin, Roth Martin Hainkel, Frilot L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for General Electric Company, Paramount Global, Foster Wheeler LLC. Kaye N. Courington, Blaine Augusta Moore, Brittney Bullock Ankersen, Jeffrey Matthew…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…its corporate state of mind for purposes of punitive damages. But, apart from citing caselaw delineating the general standard for admitting or excluding evidence, its argument was premised upon little more; namely: (1) a broad reference…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion
Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)
…upon, we think J&J has implicitly confirmed the reliability of Dr. Fitzgerald's sources by endorsing Dr. Sanchez's reliance on sources of the same general type. J&J attempts to argue that, without Dr…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 27, 2020
In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products (2020)
The court granted in part and denied in part Johnson & Johnson's motions to exclude plaintiffs' experts Saed, Longo and the general-causation experts, and denied plaintiffs' motions to exclude defense experts Diette, Saenz and Neel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2018
Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…complaint and cross-claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, and denied jurisdictional discovery. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over corporations not incorporated or headquartered in New York, and lacked specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019
English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, ruling against plaintiffs English and Raso. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over New Jersey-incorporated, New Jersey-headquartered defendants…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…and makes Volkswagen vehicles, asked to be dismissed because Washington courts lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The court found no general jurisdiction, since Volkswagen AG is neither incorporated nor based in Washington. It also found no…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2018
Germain v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…The court found the defendants had made an initial showing, but the plaintiffs' experts raised fact issues on general and specific causation. It noted that conflicting expert evidence and credibility questions must be resolved by a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 31, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…in California, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed that it was not subject to general jurisdiction in Washington because it was not incorporated or headquartered there. On specific jurisdiction, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court found no general jurisdiction because the company was not at home in Washington. It found no specific jurisdiction because the plaintiffs did not allege that the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 27, 2019
Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)
…own internal documents, so the statements were misleading when made. Opinion statements are actionable only if not honestly believed or lacking a reasonable basis, and general value statements are non-actionable puffery. Trial Procedure and Discovery
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…where the plaintiff's exposure occurred in Toronto. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendant was not at home in Washington. Personal Jurisdiction Worksites: Toronto worked with brakes and clutches on Volkswagen vehicles Toronto 1986-1994
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2018
Hooper-Lynch v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…New York, transacts business here with an articulable nexus to the claim, supporting specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) even though there is no general jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction user of cosmetic talc powder 1968-1985
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2018
Stevenson v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2018)
…in part that the Florida federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The plaintiff conceded there was no general jurisdiction and argued for specific jurisdiction. She relied on the predecessor's Florida business registration and registered…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 27, 2024
Johnson v. Johnson & Johnson (2024)
…product has a "strict 5 level safety process," is "clinically proven," and has "purity of its ingredients" goes beyond general praise and can plausibly be an express warranty of specified characteristics. consumer user of talc powder
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 22, 2016
Feinberg v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2016)
… plaintiffs had not excluded other possible causes; its talc was asbestos-free; and there was no proof of general or specific causation. The court denied the motion. Whether her earlier chest pain and pleural effusions were…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…employees or agents in Washington. The plaintiffs argued that WCD sold talc to Johnson & Johnson for nationwide distribution in cosmetic products. The court found no general jurisdiction, which the plaintiffs did not dispute. On specific jurisdiction…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 23, 2017
Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)
…in Ohio, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed. It found no general jurisdiction, because Dana Companies is neither incorporated nor headquartered in Washington. It found no specific jurisdiction either. The…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 20, 2020
English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2020)
…the New York court to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court found it could not exercise general jurisdiction because Shulton was not incorporated or headquartered in New York. It found specific jurisdiction…