40 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
James Rehm, a millwright employed by Rapid Installation from about 1975 to 1982, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2001 and died in 2002. He, and later his wife as executrix and his children, sued sixteen companies that owned the facilities where…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion
Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)
…576 (Pa. Super. 2014) (upholding the trial court's decision to enter summary judgment because the plaintiff "failed to establish that \[General Electric (GE)\] products containing asbestos were present at the worksite" and, as such, the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 22, 2022 · in the opinion
Cioni v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)
…INC., COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, CYTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FIBERITE, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC. F/K/A CUTLER HAMMER, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF THE EATON CORPORATION, OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Lyons v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2017)
…1078 \[109 Cal.Rptr.3d 371\], the plaintiffs alleged that the decedent had been exposed to asbestos by Bechtel Construction at two Pacific Gas and Electric sites constructed by Bechtel, "Contra Costa Buildings 6 and 7…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…its corporate state of mind for purposes of punitive damages. But, apart from citing caselaw delineating the general standard for admitting or excluding evidence, its argument was premised upon little more; namely: (1) a broad reference…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 6, 2022
Zicklin v. Bergdorf Goodman Inc. (2022)
The trial court denied Colgate-Palmolive's motion for summary judgment because conflicting expert opinions on general and specific causation raised fact issues; the plaintiff prevailed on the motion. Conflicting expert opinions on whether the product…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 6, 2019
Rothlein v. Imerys Talc America (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…of the remaining claims against Imerys, so the plaintiffs kept those claims. General jurisdiction over a corporation exists only where it is incorporated or has its principal place of business. A corporation that buys another's…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 26, 2013
Bernard v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2013)
…a testing expert's opinion based on a self-modified TEM method for bulk talc samples that drops accepted fiber-count and fiber-identification criteria is inadmissible because it lacks general acceptance in the scientific community…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 15, 2019
Moldow v. AI Friedman, LP (2019)
…s proof; it must show its product could not have contributed to the disease. Conflicting expert affidavits on general and specific causation raise credibility issues that cannot be resolved on motion papers. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · August 6, 2019 · in the opinion
Jackson v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)
Those sources can be grouped into four general categories: (1) talc from Cashmere Bouquet containers purchased by law firms on the internet or at antique fairs; (2) talc from Cashmere Bouquet containers that had previously been…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019
Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)
…non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 25, 2019 · in the opinion
Smith v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
… 12-15) Thus, none of these Defendants are subject to general jurisdiction in Alabama. \[4\] Plaintiff also takes issue with Downey's reliance on a summary of sales records he was given prior to his deposition…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Corin v. Arkema, Inc. (2024)
…MRW. January 4, 2024. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Remand \[DE 26\] I. INTRODUCTION On October 31…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · September 11, 2019 · in the opinion
Huff v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (2019)
…307, 310 (1999): The general rule of corporate-successor liability is that when a company sells its assets to another company, the acquiring company is not liable for the debts and liabilities of the selling company…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 23, 2022 · in the opinion
Bader v. Johnson & Johnson (2022)
…that has not gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific or medical community. Rather it was the theory of causation, that \[the pesticide\] caused plaintiff's autism, that has not gained general acceptance in the relevant…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion
Cohen v. American Biltrite (2018)
…are susceptible of expert interpretation (States v Lourdes Hosp., 100 NY2d 208, 212-213 \[2003\]; Styles v General Motors Corp., 20 AD3d 338, 340 \[1st Dept 2005\]), rather than simply the jurors' own lay interpretation without…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Lindsey v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…a copy of this order upon the Trial support clerk, located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119) and the County Clerk (Room 141B) in accordance with e-filing protocol, and it is further ORDERED…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 28, 2021 · in the opinion
Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company (2021)
…Ibid. It held that, because the defendants had general knowledge of the rollover problem, they "had notice of potential relevance to this and other litigation involving their product." Ibid. Because the evidence of destruction of raw…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2017 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Imerys Talc America Inc. (2017)
…Fitzgerald's opinion was based on the excluded testing, and therefore was also inadmissible. However, the court found Fitzgerald could give the general opinion that the product was "friable. . . that when dispersed it can be inhaled…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · March 30, 2020 · in the opinion
Kirkwood v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2020)
…avoid jurisdiction." In re Nazi Era Cases, 153 F. App'x at 823. While product line successor liability\[2\] is an exception to the general rule of successor non-liability, "no court, appears to have addressed ..…