No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

83 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 5

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · October 22, 2021

    Lindsey v. Dow Chemical Company (2021)

    Kris Lindsey, a Florida citizen diagnosed with mesothelioma in September 2020, sued twelve companies in a St. Louis state court. His amended petition alleged he was exposed to asbestos from Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, used on him as an infant and…

  2. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005

    Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)

    James Rehm, a millwright employed by Rapid Installation from about 1975 to 1982, was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2001 and died in 2002. He, and later his wife as executrix and his children, sued sixteen companies that owned the facilities where…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · December 26, 2023 · in the opinion

    Simoneaux v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2023)

    …Kelsey Eagan, Magali Ann Puente-Martin, Roth Martin Hainkel, Frilot L.L.C., New Orleans, LA, for General Electric Company, Paramount Global, Foster Wheeler LLC. Kaye N. Courington, Blaine Augusta Moore, Brittney Bullock Ankersen, Jeffrey Matthew…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

    …576 (Pa. Super. 2014) (upholding the trial court's decision to enter summary judgment because the plaintiff "failed to establish that \[General Electric (GE)\] products containing asbestos were present at the worksite" and, as such, the…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 22, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cioni v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2022)

    …INC., COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY, CYTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FIBERITE, INC., EATON ELECTRICAL, INC. F/K/A CUTLER HAMMER, INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF THE EATON CORPORATION, OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION, INDIVIDUALLY AND…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Lyons v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2017)

    …1078 \[109 Cal.Rptr.3d 371\], the plaintiffs alleged that the decedent had been exposed to asbestos by Bechtel Construction at two Pacific Gas and Electric sites constructed by Bechtel, "Contra Costa Buildings 6 and 7…

  7. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion

    Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)

    …its corporate state of mind for purposes of punitive damages. But, apart from citing caselaw delineating the general standard for admitting or excluding evidence, its argument was premised upon little more; namely: (1) a broad reference…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 21, 2021 · in the opinion

    Ann Strobel v. Johnson & Johnson (2021)

    …upon, we think J&J has implicitly confirmed the reliability of Dr. Fitzgerald's sources by endorsing Dr. Sanchez's reliance on sources of the same general type. J&J attempts to argue that, without Dr…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 6, 2022

    Zicklin v. Bergdorf Goodman Inc. (2022)

    The trial court denied Colgate-Palmolive's motion for summary judgment because conflicting expert opinions on general and specific causation raised fact issues; the plaintiff prevailed on the motion. Conflicting expert opinions on whether the product…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 27, 2020

    In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products (2020)

    The court granted in part and denied in part Johnson & Johnson's motions to exclude plaintiffs' experts Saed, Longo and the general-causation experts, and denied plaintiffs' motions to exclude defense experts Diette, Saenz and Neel…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 31, 2018

    Crozier v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …complaint and cross-claims for lack of personal jurisdiction, and denied jurisdictional discovery. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over corporations not incorporated or headquartered in New York, and lacked specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 12, 2019

    English v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …to dismiss the plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims against them for lack of personal jurisdiction, ruling against plaintiffs English and Raso. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over New Jersey-incorporated, New Jersey-headquartered defendants…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …and makes Volkswagen vehicles, asked to be dismissed because Washington courts lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The court found no general jurisdiction, since Volkswagen AG is neither incorporated nor based in Washington. It also found no…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 18, 2018

    Germain v. Johnson & Johnson (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …The court found the defendants had made an initial showing, but the plaintiffs' experts raised fact issues on general and specific causation. It noted that conflicting expert evidence and credibility questions must be resolved by a…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 26, 2013

    Bernard v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2013)

    …a testing expert's opinion based on a self-modified TEM method for bulk talc samples that drops accepted fiber-count and fiber-identification criteria is inadmissible because it lacks general acceptance in the scientific community…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 31, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …in California, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed that it was not subject to general jurisdiction in Washington because it was not incorporated or headquartered there. On specific jurisdiction, the…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court found no general jurisdiction because the company was not at home in Washington. It found no specific jurisdiction because the plaintiffs did not allege that the…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · December 27, 2019

    Hall v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)

    …own internal documents, so the statements were misleading when made. Opinion statements are actionable only if not honestly believed or lacking a reasonable basis, and general value statements are non-actionable puffery. Trial Procedure and Discovery

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …where the plaintiff's exposure occurred in Toronto. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendant was not at home in Washington. Personal Jurisdiction Worksites: Toronto worked with brakes and clutches on Volkswagen vehicles Toronto 1986-1994

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · July 10, 2018

    Stevenson v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. (2018)

    …in part that the Florida federal court lacked personal jurisdiction over it. The plaintiff conceded there was no general jurisdiction and argued for specific jurisdiction. She relied on the predecessor's Florida business registration and registered…