7 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007 · in the opinion
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
…judgment as a matter of law. Ford Motor Company Ford Motor Company designed, manufactured, and sold motor vehicles during the period from 1975 to 1982. Rehm worked at two Ford plants in Louisville while employed by…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 25, 2005
Rehm v. Navistar International (2005)
…the appellees (including Allied Chemical, DuPont, Ford, GE, Kentucky Utilities Ghent Powerhouse, LG&E Cane Run and Mill Creek), Louisville millwright Facilities owned by the appellees (including Allied Chemical, DuPont, Ford, GE, Kentucky Utilities Ghent Powerhouse…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · January 29, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2021)
…our Supreme Court cautions against "instructions getting into evidentiary matters, subquestions which better practice suggests should be omitted from the instructions and left to the lawyers to flesh out in closing arguments." Ford Motor Co. v…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 21, 2020 · in the opinion
Brandt v. Bon-Ton Stores, Inc. (2020)
…regularity, and proximity such that a fact-finder may infer that the plaintiff's exposure was a substantial factor in causing her harm. Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1052-53 (Pa. 2016…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 8, 2018 · in the opinion
Alfaro v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2018)
…the determination of whether these fees were reasonably necessary, are issues left to the discretion of the trial court." (Adams v. Ford Motor Co. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 1475, 1484 \[132 Cal.Rptr.3d 424…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · October 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Williams v. Avon Products, Inc. (2019)
…2:17-CV-86, 2017 WL 3033425, at [\4] (S.D. Tex. July 18, 2017) (quoting Garcia v. Ford Motor Co., No. 1:12-CV-181, 2013 WL 12137090, at [\3] (S.D. Tex. May 10…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion
Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)
…containing product was sufficiently \frequent, regular and proximate' to support a jury's finding that \[the\] defendant's product was substantially causative of the disease." Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 151 A.3d 1032, 1044 (Pa…