10 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion
Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)
…were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 30, 2007 · in the opinion
AstenJohnson v. Columbia Cas. Co. (2007)
…to Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, Asten represented: "It has been our policy to apprise Asten-Hill \[Manufacturing Company\]'s general liability and excess liability carriers of all pending claims, enclosing a photocopy of each Complaint…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)
…UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)
…UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)
…the Plan B Settlement as the default, or fallback, settlement in the event that the court could not approve the Plan A Settlement.\[11\] Debtors' former General Counsel, John Gasparovic, testified that during "the negotiations of…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Landry v. Columbia Casualty Company (2014)
…a voluntary act of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs correctly argue that the general rule is that "other paper" does not render a case removable unless it is generated by the voluntary act of a plaintiff. Plaintiffs' argument fails…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2005 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2005)
…however, rule out the desirability of considering trends general to the industry, particularly regarding the rate of filing of claims. The total number of claims to be expected should be estimated. The estimation of claims should…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion
In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)
…Amchem, \_\_\_ U.S. at \_\_\_, 117 S.Ct. at 2248. This general theme, expressed forcefully in Amchem, is reinforced by the Court's discussion of specific issues, most of which are highly relevant to the instant case…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · June 1, 1989 · in the opinion
Carey Canada Inc. v. California Union Ins. Co. (1989)
…Thus, the meaning of asbestosis was a matter of public record years before defendants' policies were sold. Numerous general circulation newspaper and magazine articles about the various asbestos-related health hazards, including articles in The New…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)
…"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…