No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 12, 2015 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2015)

    …contractor. Scherer next testified that "\[t\]hey were \[Con\] Edison's specifications or in the case of the boiler, they were Combustion Engineering boiler specifications or turbines would be General Electric or \[Allis\] Chambers." (Tr. 5257)…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · July 8, 1988 · in the opinion

    Knox v. AC & S, Inc. (1988)

    …any site or area where a hazardous substance has been deposited, stored, disposed of, or otherwise come to be located." State v. General Electric Co., 592 F.Supp. 291, 295 (N.D. NY 1984) (citation omitted)…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. 3M Company (2014)

    …him with the asbestos-insulated wires to which he was exposed. Mr. Smith worked as an electrician in the construction industry from 1959 through 2003. In or about March of 2013 he was diagnosed with mesothelioma…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2014)

    …contractors were "essentially restrained from taking independent action without first obtaining Con Edison's approval"; 2) 1958 Articles of General Conditions, arguing that its specifications and drawings were binding on the contractors and rendered Con Edison …

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …and Johnny Johnson. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse), settled and dismissed their appeals with all plaintiffs but Earlven Gauthe and Johnny Johnson after oral argument, but days before…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 11, 2013 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2013)

    …14th Street and for LILCO the Northport, who was it that told the insulators and the boilermakers and the steamfitters and the electricians and the plumbers, who was it that told all of the trades what…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · May 24, 1983 · in the opinion

    Wedgeworth v. Fibreboard Corp. (1983)

    …forum. Defendants have not shown that any hardship complained of is the result of proceeding to trial now. Nor is there a showing that the difficulties inherent in the general situation, including potential judicial inefficiency, constitute…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 13, 1981 · in the opinion

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    …to be persuaded that the choice of law made in Flatt is correct. That is, under any standard, federal law applies. Aerojet-General Corporation v. Askew, 511 F.2d 710 [\1361] (5th Cir. 1975); Willis v…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Croteau v. Treadwell Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2007)

    …301] itself, preclude Con Edison from obtaining indemnification from Treadwell. The subsequent enactment of General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 in 1975 has no retroactive applicability to this situation (see Sapper v St. Vincent's Hosp…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 27, 1988 · in the opinion

    Blazek v. Nicolet, Inc. (1988)

    …We disagree. • 1 The general intent of statutes of repose is to "terminate the possibility of liability after a defined period of time, regardless of a potential plaintiff's lack of knowledge of his cause of…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …and Allis-Chalmers, Con Ed's general contractor. The jury found that Brown had been exposed to asbestos at [\613] Ravenswood, that Con Ed had exercised supervision and control over workers at the powerhouse and had…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 15, 1988 · in the opinion

    Whatley v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1988)

    …474 (5th Cir.1985); see Shipp v. General Motors Corp., 750 F.2d 418, 425 (5th Cir.1985) (Duncan placed the allocative burden of comparative causation on the defendant). Sufficiency of the Evidence Whatley contends that…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 9, 2001 · in the opinion

    Emery v. Owens-Corporation (2001)

    …suitable references to plaintiff's closing argument), we issue a precautionary warning that the general reference to "witnesses" in its admissibility assertion skirts the outer perimeter of Rule 2-12.4. \[9\] See La. Acts 1979…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · May 30, 1980 · in the opinion

    Migues v. Nicolet Industries, Inc. (1980)

    …in recognition of certain policy concerns, pro rata apportionment between joint tortfeasors. The Court has noted with some emphasis the later decision of the Texas Supreme Court in General Motors Corporation v. Simmons, 558 S.W…