No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · December 3, 2003 · in the opinion

    Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …in the Law 1993-1994, 55 La. L.Rev. 657, 658 (1995); Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984); Faraldo v. Hanover Ins. Co., 600 So.2d 81…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion

    Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)

    …in that no reasonable finder of fact could determine from the evidence that Garlock, Inc., Uniroyal Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., Johns Manville Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Dr. John Konzen or Richard F…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion

    Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2003)

    …claim were analyzed, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that "a cause of action arises when negligent or tortious conduct causes injury." Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788, 790 (La…

  4. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 14, 1987 · in the opinion

    Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1987)

    …Mileaf, of New York, New York, for amicus curiae Keene Corporation. William A. Sawinski, of Toledo, Ohio, for amicus curiae Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation. James T. Otis, Robert A. Creamer, Robert C. Gislason, Patty J. Dyer…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …Inc., 151 F.3d 297 (5th Cir.1998). Owens Corning, a major asbestos manufacturer, sought to create a "National Settlement Program" outside the judicial system by entering private contracts with plaintiffs' firms that would have settled…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)

    …limited fund. Fibreboard was recently acquired by Owens-Corning in a tender offer for about $515 million cash, plus $85 million of assumed debt. See Andrea Puchalsky, Owens-Corning to Buy Fibreboard for $515 million, WALL…

  7. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1523, 1538 (S.D. Ga. 1983) (endeavoring to provide guidance "carefully, methodically and with an eye toward practical solutions"); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 138 N.J. 437, 477-78…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion

    Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)

    …including California, see Montrose Chemical, 10 Cal.4th 645, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 897 P.2d 1, New Jersey, see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co., 138 N.J. 437, 650 A.2d 974…

  9. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    … Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America, supra, 667 F.2d 1044 n.19, 1047 n.25; Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., supra, 138 N.J. 457. For these reasons, we are persuaded…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …the reasons discussed below, we conclude that that cause should be characterized as the continuing process of the manufacture and sale of asbestos containing products. On point again is Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United Insurance Co…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …the trial court's method of apportionment is not challenged on appeal, we find no error in the decision to hold each policy responsible in full subject to such apportionment.\[17\] (See also Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  12. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 27, 1986

    Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)

    …but not by the intervening period; each triggered insurer owes full indemnity and defense to the insured, and the duty to defend ends when policy limits are exhausted by payment of judgments or settlements. Expert Testimony…

  13. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 20, 2008

    Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …denying Pennsylvania General Insurance equitable contribution from Nationwide and Continental, and remanded for further proceedings on the shares each owes. Under Ohio's all-sums approach, an insurer selected by the insured that pays an entire…

  14. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)

    …to the trust fund received from other primary insurers; c) Continental owes no recovery to the Trust with respect to any Trust Claim absent an allocated percentage proposed to Continental; d) The Trustee did not comply…

  15. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …exception among the insurers may be CNA, which alleges that the Debtor owes it a sum of money on account of the premium arrangement under the terms of its policy, and that that debt arose pre…