- Organization: Commercial Union Insurance Company
- Organization: Highlands Insurance Company
- Clear filters
8 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · December 3, 2003 · in the opinion
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…in the Law 1993-1994, 55 La. L.Rev. 657, 658 (1995); Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984); Faraldo v. Hanover Ins. Co., 600 So.2d 81…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)
…in that no reasonable finder of fact could determine from the evidence that Garlock, Inc., Uniroyal Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., Johns Manville Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Dr. John Konzen or Richard F…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion
Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2003)
…claim were analyzed, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that "a cause of action arises when negligent or tortious conduct causes injury." Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788, 790 (La…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 14, 1987 · in the opinion
Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1987)
…Mileaf, of New York, New York, for amicus curiae Keene Corporation. William A. Sawinski, of Toledo, Ohio, for amicus curiae Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation. James T. Otis, Robert A. Creamer, Robert C. Gislason, Patty J. Dyer…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion
Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)
…including California, see Montrose Chemical, 10 Cal.4th 645, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 897 P.2d 1, New Jersey, see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co., 138 N.J. 437, 650 A.2d 974…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002
Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)
…sued its liability and property insurers in Connecticut federal court, seeking a declaration that its policies covered what it spent to deal with lead and asbestos in buildings it owns. Several insurers moved for summary judgment…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 27, 1986
Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
…but not by the intervening period; each triggered insurer owes full indemnity and defense to the insured, and the duty to defend ends when policy limits are exhausted by payment of judgments or settlements. Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 31, 1985
Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec v. Am. Home Assur. Co. (1985)
…injury or property damage that appears years after exposure or installation, and whether each triggered insurer owes the full loss or only a prorated share. It found the policy language ambiguous and construed it in favor…