No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 12, 2015 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2015)

    …contractor. Scherer next testified that "\[t\]hey were \[Con\] Edison's specifications or in the case of the boiler, they were Combustion Engineering boiler specifications or turbines would be General Electric or \[Allis\] Chambers." (Tr. 5257)…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2014 · in the opinion

    Smith v. 3M Company (2014)

    …him with the asbestos-insulated wires to which he was exposed. Mr. Smith worked as an electrician in the construction industry from 1959 through 2003. In or about March of 2013 he was diagnosed with mesothelioma…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2014)

    …contractors were "essentially restrained from taking independent action without first obtaining Con Edison's approval"; 2) 1958 Articles of General Conditions, arguing that its specifications and drawings were binding on the contractors and rendered Con Edison …

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 11, 2013 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Bell & Gossett Co. (2013)

    …14th Street and for LILCO the Northport, who was it that told the insulators and the boilermakers and the steamfitters and the electricians and the plumbers, who was it that told all of the trades what…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · May 7, 1986

    Silver v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    …§ 1-50(6), barred the claim because his last exposure was in 1961. The Fourth Circuit agreed that the statute applies to wrongful death actions in general. It held, however, that the statute did not apply…

  6. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001 · in the opinion

    Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)

    …[\1036] Moreover, section 2 was enacted to extend the general limitations period in express recognition of the long latency period associated with asbestos-related diseases and illnesses. Extending the limitations period only for the very few…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · June 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Croteau v. Treadwell Corp. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2007)

    …301] itself, preclude Con Edison from obtaining indemnification from Treadwell. The subsequent enactment of General Obligations Law § 5-322.1 in 1975 has no retroactive applicability to this situation (see Sapper v St. Vincent's Hosp…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · January 27, 1984 · in the opinion

    Doe v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1984)

    …June 27, 1978 is broad in its scope and is to be liberally construed,\[3\] but is not without its limitations. In its general provision it states: Courts of record, within their respective jurisdictions, shall have…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Brown v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …and Allis-Chalmers, Con Ed's general contractor. The jury found that Brown had been exposed to asbestos at [\613] Ravenswood, that Con Ed had exercised supervision and control over workers at the powerhouse and had…

  10. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · November 19, 1982 · in the opinion

    Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona (1982)

    …The new statute may cure problems such as the one presented by this case. Under the general provisions, the statute of limitations commences only when the workman knows or should know that "he has sustained a…