No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

32 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls) and many other companies in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in January 2022, from asbestos exposure. He alleged he worked at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Huntington Ingalls (Avondale) and many other defendants in Louisiana state court. He alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 as a carpenter and insulator.…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 6, 2016 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)

    …69" for "at least four months." (Pl.'s Ex. 4 at 11-14.)\[2\] The work was an overhaul of a General Electric fossil fuel turbine which required removal and reinstallation of insulation, including asbestos blankets…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co. (2018)

    …11) (emphasis in original). Hopeman then explains that, in light of Appalachian Insurance Co. v. General Electric Co., 8 N.Y.3d 162, 831 N.Y.S.2d 742, 863 N.E.2d 994, 999 (2007)…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls (2022)

    …24, 2014). In Vedros, the plaintiff filed suit against multiple defendants in state court, and three defendants, General Electric, Foster-Wheeler, and Westinghouse, subsequently removed the case pursuant to the federal officer removal statute. Id. at…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · May 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau (2018)

    …or the distance that Daniel Ahnert worked from any asbestos. He characterized his "general" report as a "review of the industrial hygiene literature as it relates to asbestos"—"kind of a rundown of asbestos information. Id…

  7. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)

    …to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)

    …of Daniel Ahnert, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU, PABST BREWING COMPANY, SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION, WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. 13-C-1456. January 7, 2016. United States District Court, E.D…

  9. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · June 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Penn. Gen. Ins. v. Park-Ohio Ind. (2010)

    126 Ohio St.3d 98 (2010) 2010-Ohio-2745 930 N.E.2d 800 PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS. No. 2009-0104. Submitted December 2, 2009…

  10. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    …in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…

  11. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…

  12. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    Pepsi-Cola v. Employers Ins. Co. (2022)

    …was filed by Robert Gilbert of Latham & Watkins, LLP of Boston, Massachusetts, for Wisconsin Manufacturing & Commerce and Emerson Electric Company. A nonparty brief was filed by James A. Friedman of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. of Madison…

  13. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  16. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 20, 2008

    Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (2008)

    The appeals court reversed the trial court's judgment denying Pennsylvania General Insurance equitable contribution from Nationwide and Continental, and remanded for further proceedings on the shares each owes. Under Ohio's all-sums approach, an…

  17. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. (1999)

    The "fund" in this case comprised both the general assets of Fibreboard and the insurance assets provided by the two policies, see 90 F. 3d, at 982 (describing the fund as Fibreboard's entire equity and…

  18. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)

    …and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…

  19. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016

    In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)

    …8.3 of the Plan and Continental had to respond, so the Trustee prevailed. A chapter 11 plan is a contract interpreted under general contract rules (here Illinois law). The plan's term "allocated percentage" has…

  20. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…