No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …the reasons discussed below, we conclude that that cause should be characterized as the continuing process of the manufacture and sale of asbestos containing products. On point again is Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United Insurance Co…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)

    …Mitchell, Fibreboard Corporation, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Continental Casualty Company, Pacific Indemnity, Francis McGovern, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, Columbia Casualty Company, CNA Casualty Company of California, Celotex Corp., Daniel Herman Rudd Jr., on…

  3. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1523, 1538 (S.D. Ga. 1983) (endeavoring to provide guidance "carefully, methodically and with an eye toward practical solutions"); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 138 N.J. 437, 477-78…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion

    Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)

    …including California, see Montrose Chemical, 10 Cal.4th 645, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 897 P.2d 1, New Jersey, see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co., 138 N.J. 437, 650 A.2d 974…

  5. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    … Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America, supra, 667 F.2d 1044 n.19, 1047 n.25; Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., supra, 138 N.J. 457. For these reasons, we are persuaded…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …the trial court's method of apportionment is not challenged on appeal, we find no error in the decision to hold each policy responsible in full subject to such apportionment.\[17\] (See also Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  7. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)

    …version of the drafting intent of §8.3 and the related Plan provisions. This will not be necessary and §16.11 of the Plan\[9\] precludes it as does Illinois law. See Air Safety, Inc. v…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …Inc., 151 F.3d 297 (5th Cir.1998). Owens Corning, a major asbestos manufacturer, sought to create a "National Settlement Program" outside the judicial system by entering private contracts with plaintiffs' firms that would have settled…

  9. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)

    …discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies ten bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning, USG, and others. See Garlock Exhibit 203 at 7-30. To the extent that Garlock offered these documents to…

  10. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)

    …discovery response marked as Exhibit 203 identifies 10 bankrupt entities, including Armstrong, Babcock & Wilcox, Fibreboard, Owens Corning, USG, and others. See Garlock Exhibit 203 at 7-30. To the extent that Garlock offered these documents to…

  11. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 20, 2008

    Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …denying Pennsylvania General Insurance equitable contribution from Nationwide and Continental, and remanded for further proceedings on the shares each owes. Under Ohio's all-sums approach, an insurer selected by the insured that pays an entire…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 30, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mt. McKinley Ins. Co. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (2014)

    …553, 652 A.2d 948, 951 (1995). Should either PPG or Corning breach a contractual duty it owes under the policies, Mt. McKinley may assert that as a defense in coverage litigation. Neither PPG nor Corning…

  13. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion

    In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)

    … 105 injunction restraining creditors from proceeding against non-debtors may be appropriate: when the non-debtor owns assets which will either be a source of funds for the debtor or when the preservation of the non…

  14. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …exception among the insurers may be CNA, which alleges that the Debtor owes it a sum of money on account of the premium arrangement under the terms of its policy, and that that debt arose pre…