No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

21 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 24, 2014

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2014)

    …Pennsylvania and returned to the Eastern District of Louisiana. After the court dismissed all claims against General Electric and Foster-Wheeler and the turbine claims against Westinghouse, the plaintiffs asked to send the case back to…

  2. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · August 31, 2007

    Asbestos Corporation Limited v. Akaiwa (2007)

    …summary judgment is limited to the materials designated to the trial court, so evidence first offered on appeal is not considered. Product Identification; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Everett Electric electrical contractor Everett Electric 1980-1982

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · January 9, 2017 · in the opinion

    Grimes v. AT&T Corp. (2017)

    …LLP. FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, Cross Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP & DAVID SCHUYLER BLOW, SEDGWICK LLP. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Cross Defendant, represented by CHRISTOPHER J. KEALE, SEDGWICK LLP & DAVID SCHUYLER BLOW, SEDGWICK LLP. IMO…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998 · in the opinion

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    …reach the consumer in the same condition as it left the manufacturer\]; and Artiglio v. General Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 830, 71 Cal.Rptr.2d 817 \[silcone supplier not liable to user of…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · October 23, 2017 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2017)

    …Marks, SEDGWICK LLP & Erin P. Fraser, SEDGWICK LLP. Gardner-Denver Inc, Defendant, represented by Claude Bosworth, RIZZO MATTINGLY BOSWORTH PC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Christopher S. Marks, SEDGWICK LLP & Erin P. Fraser, SEDGWICK LLP…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Pichon v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)

    …the theory of successor liability for any damages resulting from Mr. Pichon's pre-1988 exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or sold by General Motors \["GM"\]? (2) Did the trial court err by determining…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …that exposure sufficient to cause asbestosis is also sufficient to cause mesothelioma, lung cancer, and pleural plaques. \[18\] The crafts were divided into four general groupings: "Production Crafts" (some thirteen in all, including e.g. pumper…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …454-6, at 14). Though both experts opined that, in general, Mr. Hutchins's work on steamships exposed him to asbestos enough to be a substantial factor in bringing about his mesothelioma, neither expert established significant…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …and Johnny Johnson. CBS Corporation, formerly known as Westinghouse Electric Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Westinghouse), settled and dismissed their appeals with all plaintiffs but Earlven Gauthe and Johnny Johnson after oral argument, but days before…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 29, 2015

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)

    …of asbestos knowledge, the Walsh-Healey Act, specific risk percentages, life expectancy, and general symptoms and quality of life, plus an unlisted 1956 article. It also struck his rebuttal report to Dr. Stockman. It kept the…

  11. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    § 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…

  12. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)

    …It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2014 · in the opinion

    Genusa v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2014)

    …Accordingly, this court has held that the current version of 28 U.S.C. § 1441 allows removal of general maritime claims without requiring an additional source of federal jurisdiction. See Garza v. Phillips 66 Co., No…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 21, 2010 · in the opinion

    Marchand v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)

    …s executive officers and Continental Insurance Company (Continental) as the successor by merger to Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York (Fidelity), in its capacity as the general liability carrier of Pendleton. On January 14, 2010…

  15. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · January 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2007)

    …of asbestos claims including: (i) all of the Debtors' interest in asbestos insurance coverage provided in their general liability insurance (ii) 3,800,000 new shares of Congoleum Class A common stock (but only if the…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Asbestos Corporation Limited (2013)

    …C. § 1332(a). In removal cases, as a general rule, "diversity of citizenship must exist both at the time of filing in state court and at the time of removal to federal court." Coury v. Prot…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gea Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. v. First State Insurance Company (2023)

    …June 24, 2019) (the "Thornton Action"). Defendants, or their predecessors, issued certain primary or excess general liability policies (the "Policies") to GEA Mechanical's predecessor, Centrico, Inc. ("Centrico"),\[2\] covering various periods from May 15, 1979…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 23, 1996 · in the opinion

    Kellogg v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (1996)

    …two statutes, a court must construe the statutes in the context of the entire statutory system of which they are a part in order to achieve harmony with other statutes on the same general subject. This…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 7, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rogers v. Asbestos Corp. Limited (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …2d 1116 (Del. Super. 1986). It is well-established that a plaintiff does not meet his burden of proof by simply placing the product at the general work site. Conway v. A.C.& S, C.A…