No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

33 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 24, 2014

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2014)

    …Pennsylvania and returned to the Eastern District of Louisiana. After the court dismissed all claims against General Electric and Foster-Wheeler and the turbine claims against Westinghouse, the plaintiffs asked to send the case back to…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hopeman Brothers, Inc. v. Continental Cas. Co. (2018)

    …11) (emphasis in original). Hopeman then explains that, in light of Appalachian Insurance Co. v. General Electric Co., 8 N.Y.3d 162, 831 N.Y.S.2d 742, 863 N.E.2d 994, 999 (2007)…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 17, 2010 · in the opinion

    Pichon v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)

    …the theory of successor liability for any damages resulting from Mr. Pichon's pre-1988 exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or sold by General Motors \["GM"\]? (2) Did the trial court err by determining…

  4. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · June 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Penn. Gen. Ins. v. Park-Ohio Ind. (2010)

    126 Ohio St.3d 98 (2010) 2010-Ohio-2745 930 N.E.2d 800 PENNSYLVANIA GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. PARK-OHIO INDUSTRIES; NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL., APPELLANTS. No. 2009-0104. Submitted December 2, 2009…

  5. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    …in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…

  6. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …454-6, at 14). Though both experts opined that, in general, Mr. Hutchins's work on steamships exposed him to asbestos enough to be a substantial factor in bringing about his mesothelioma, neither expert established significant…

  8. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  11. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · November 20, 2008

    Pennsylvania Gen. Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc. (2008)

    The appeals court reversed the trial court's judgment denying Pennsylvania General Insurance equitable contribution from Nationwide and Continental, and remanded for further proceedings on the shares each owes. Under Ohio's all-sums approach, an…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 29, 2015

    Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)

    …of asbestos knowledge, the Walsh-Healey Act, specific risk percentages, life expectancy, and general symptoms and quality of life, plus an unlisted 1956 article. It also struck his rebuttal report to Dr. Stockman. It kept the…

  13. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1999 · in the opinion

    Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. (1999)

    The "fund" in this case comprised both the general assets of Fibreboard and the insurance assets provided by the two policies, see 90 F. 3d, at 982 (describing the fund as Fibreboard's entire equity and…

  14. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    § 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…

  15. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)

    …and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)

    …It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…

  17. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California · November 21, 2016

    In re Cfb Liquidating Corporation (2016)

    …8.3 of the Plan and Continental had to respond, so the Trustee prevailed. A chapter 11 plan is a contract interpreted under general contract rules (here Illinois law). The plan's term "allocated percentage" has…

  18. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion

    Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)

    …FM Insurance Company, Republic Insurance Company, First State Insurance Company, United States Fire Insurance Company, Houston General Insurance Company, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Old Republic Insurance [\1179] Company, American Centennial Insurance Company, The Constitution State…

  20. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…