No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

23 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · September 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jolly v. General Elec. Co. (2021)

    435 S.C. 607 (2021) 869 S.E.2d 819 Beverly Dale JOLLY and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, etal., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)

    …EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US, INC., individually and as successor to BYRON JACKSON PUMP COMPANY; FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, f/k/a Fluor Corporation; FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION; FLUOR ENTERPRISES, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC…

  3. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …Inc., f/k/a Daniel Construction Company, Inc.; Fluor Daniel Services Corporation; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; Goodyear Tire & Rubber; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Grinnell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corp., f/k/a ITT…

  4. Court case · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Dias v. Fisher Controls Int'l (In re Hawaii State Asbestos Cases, 2017)

    …INC., individually and as successor by merger to THE NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 10) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation, 11) INGERSOLL RAND CO., individually and as successor-in-interest to ALDRICH…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)

    …Mr. Woolard did not mention Foxboro at all during his deposition, and there is no indication that his general testimony covers instrument features specific to (and therefore capable of identifying) Foxboro products. A second fact witness…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Ms. Finch has not shown that Pfizer reasonably should have known that the pre-1978 records may have…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · August 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    Finch v. Covil Corporation (2020)

    As we have explained: \[J\]ury instructions articulate general principles of law that decide cases. Of course appellate opinions may guide a district judge's discretion in formulating jury instructions, or even bear upon the formation…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …high known or potential rate of error and whether there are standards controlling the technique's operation," and (4) "\[w\]hether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community." Kumho Tire Co.…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 23, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hernandez-Vega v. Fisher Controls Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …early 1960s; and that any packing sold by Fisher for use with its valves was pre-sized. Arguments Fisher maintains that this court lacks both general and specific jurisdiction. This argument was not waived, Fisher asserts…

  12. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · January 5, 2022 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2022)

    …s operations allegedly exposed persons to asbestos, resulting in claims and lawsuits against it. Penn insured Covil under comprehensive general liability policies between March 1986 and March 1988. One of the lawsuits against Covil, Rollins v…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Finch v. Covil Corporation (2020)

    …nature of Mr. White's representation. \[5\] Section 33-14-107(b) requires that the notice "(1) be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in the county where the dissolved corporation's principal office. …

  14. Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Covil Corporation (2011)

    …erred by failing to apply the average weekly wages in conjunction with section 97-38. "\\[I\]n discerning the intent of the General Assembly, statutes in pari materia should be construed together and harmonized whenever possible.'…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 1, 2019 · in the opinion

    Finch v. Covil Corporation (2019)

    …130:23 -131:1. The fact that this evidence also made Covil "look bad" in some general sense does not make it inadmissible character evidence or unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403. It was highly relevant and…

  16. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · July 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)

    …recognition of the role notice provisions play in insurance contracts," and stating, "Had the General Assembly intended to categorically prohibit the enforcement of notice clauses in all policies, it would have done so." 427 S.C…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …517, 526 (N.D. Cal. 2009) ("A general concern over litigation does not trigger a duty to preserve evidence."). Absent a duty to retain destroyed records, there can be no spoliation. IV. Motion to Strike MNRM…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)

    …1979, testified that, in his role as a general foreman at the Fiber Industries facility, he ordered\[6\] insulation material from Covil because Daniel International "had a contract to buy \[insulation\] through Covil." (ECF No. 208…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …cross-claims, Covil asserted counterclaims against Zurich and cross-claims against Sentry, USF&G, TIG, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company ("Hartford"), "each of \[which\] issued general liability policies to Covil" (Docket Entry 155, ¶ 109). (Id., ¶…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …he was "pretty sure" there were "some Anchor\[ \]" valves there. (See ECF No. 312-1 at 23.) As a general matter, Mr. Draughn testified that "if a valve needed replacing" a supervisor "could send \[a mechanic…