No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “Owens-Illinois”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 15, 2007

    Vince v. Crane Co. (2007)

    …appeals court affirmed summary judgments for Crane Company and Goodyear Tire & Rubber against the estate of Nathalie Vince, and dismissed Owens-Illinois from the appeal because it had settled with the estate. Under Horton v. Harwick…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Norris v. Crane Company (2008)

    …Indeed, both parties assumed that quite complicated design considerations were at issue, and that expert testimony was necessary to illuminate these matters." (Ibid.) In Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., supra, 32 Cal.App.4th at page…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …cause of the injuries, and (4) that the product was expected to and did reach the consumer without substantial change in its condition." Phipps, 363 A.2d at 958, quoted in Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 21, 2011 · in the opinion

    Linster v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2011)

    …J.H. France Refractories Co., J.P. Stevens, Inc., Melrath Gasket, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pecora Corporation, Rapid American Corporation, Rhone-Poulenc, Riley Stoker Corporation, Sepco Corporation, Inc., Sid Harvey Midatlantic, Inc…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …this argument, and Cadlo demonstrates that it is fundamentally flawed. We held in Cadlo that Owens-Illinois could not be held strictly liable for Kaylo, a product that it developed and then Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · July 25, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Co. (2013)

    …the function and role of the parties; (3) the types of vehicles and instrumentalities involved; and (4) the causation and nature of the injury suffered." Id. at 1121-22 (quoting Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. U.S…

  7. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    …Const. Co., Inc., 545 S.W.2d 8, 11-12 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1976); Ballinger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 829 F.2d 38, No. 86-5755, 1987 WL 44451, at [\1] (6th Cir. Sept. 14, 1987…

  8. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)

    … Chavez v. Noble Drilling Corp., 567 F.2d 287, 289 (5th Cir. 1978); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 450 (Ala. 1992) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433b, comment a). \[5\] Defendant…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)

    …a personal injury asbestos case \\[to\] prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)

    …that he has suffered damages, and 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …case "must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods.…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Dougherty v. AO Smith Corporation (2014)

    …federal defense; and (4) there is a causal nexus between the claims and the conduct performed under color of a federal office. Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Rhode Island · July 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Moore v. Crane Company (2021)

    …precluded it from notifying individuals of the presence of asbestos in the work environment. Id. at [\4]. A similar conclusion was reached in Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F. Supp. 2d 653 (E.D…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)

    …the December 23, 2013 hearing prepared to argue the issue of successor liability. \[3\] See, e.g., Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (North Carolina law); Jackson v…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Faddish v. Buffalo Pumps (2012)

    …Ferayorni v. Hyundai Motor Co., 711 So.2d 1167, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), following Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549, 558 (1991). Under…