No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009

    Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2009)

    …Cork, DAP, Pneumo Abex and Owens-Illinois, ruling against Jon and Lois Burger. A plaintiff opposing summary judgment in an asbestos case must produce evidence that he inhaled asbestos fibers from the particular defendant's product…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)

    …Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 472 (Sparks).) Products liability may be premised upon a theory of design defect, manufacturing defect, or failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. …

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc. (2009)

    …this argument, and Cadlo demonstrates that it is fundamentally flawed. We held in Cadlo that Owens-Illinois could not be held strictly liable for Kaylo, a product that it developed and then Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 24, 2008 · in the opinion

    Cunningham v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …plaintiffs failed to establish its products caused Cunningham's mesothelioma. We disagree. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling two-part test for determining whether exposure to asbestos…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · February 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Vanaman v. Dap, Inc. (2009)

    …American Standard, 966 A.2d 573, 2009 WL 281177 (Pa.Super.2009) (en banc) and Burger v. Owens-Illinois, 966 A.2d 611, 2009 WL 325543 (Pa.Super.2009), I will not burden the reader with…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    …maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Conner v. Alfa Laval…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 23, 2022 · in the opinion

    Sampey v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The third…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

    …types of product defects: (1) manufacturing defects; (2) design defects, and (3) warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, [\1359] 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\].) The…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion

    Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)

    …in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 15, 2017 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2017)

    …inter alia, upon a theory of design defect. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Defective design may be established under two theories: (1) the consumer expectations test, which asks "whether…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)

    …cases, the Washington Supreme Court held, in relevant part, that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of an asbestos-containing product that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply. Simonetta…