No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 2, 2018

    Matter of Crozier v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)

    …Avon's powder. They moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction or on forum non conveniens grounds. The court found no general jurisdiction, since neither company was incorporated or based in New York. It found…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 27, 2018

    Brewer v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2018)

    …jurisdiction and on forum non conveniens grounds, arguing that everything happened in Minnesota. The court found no general jurisdiction, since neither company was incorporated or based in New York. It did find specific jurisdiction under New…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2019

    Olson v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …talcum powder, because the claim has an articulable nexus to that business. General jurisdiction was lacking because the defendants are not incorporated or headquartered in New York. Personal Jurisdiction consumer user of talcum powder 1953-2015

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 3, 2018

    Hooper-Lynch v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …New York, transacts business here with an articulable nexus to the claim, supporting specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) even though there is no general jurisdiction. Personal Jurisdiction user of cosmetic talc powder 1968-1985

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2018

    Black v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …and Cyprus Amax Minerals, moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and on forum non conveniens grounds. The court found no general jurisdiction, because both companies are incorporated and based elsewhere. It found specific jurisdiction…

  6. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 4, 2018

    Shulman v. Imerys Talc America (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …as to Imerys. Imerys is a Delaware corporation based in California, so New York had no general jurisdiction over it. The court nonetheless found specific jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute. In interrogatory answers…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019

    Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)

    …non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 20, 2020 · in the opinion

    Minassian v. Kolmar Laboratories (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …notice to the party seeking discovery, and specifically requires that the party withholding disclosure state: "(1) the type of document; (2) the general subject matter of the document; (3) the date of the document; and (4)…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · July 31, 2019 · in the opinion

    LaFLAIR v. Johnson & Johnson (2019)

    …thus requiring the Court to interpret each allegation as against Kolmar individually. While these "general allegation\[s\] would arguably be insufficient under federal pleading standards, the question at this stage is whether Plaintiff\['s\] pleadings are…