No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)

    …a personal injury asbestos case \\[to\] prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)

    …Nov. 7, 2014). See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., No. 95-1687, 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23, 1996) (applying Lohrmann to North Carolina case involving a plaintiff with mesothelioma…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …is in accord with federal courts that have routinely reached the same conclusion. See, e.g., Haislip v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 F.3d 1150 (table), 1996 WL 273686, at [\2] (4th Cir. May 23…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)

    …v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation. Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc., 373 S.C. 179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69…

  6. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…

  7. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…