No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · September 1, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jolly v. General Elec. Co. (2021)

    435 S.C. 607 (2021) 869 S.E.2d 819 Beverly Dale JOLLY and Brenda Rice Jolly, Respondents, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, etal., Defendants, Of whom Fisher Controls International LLC and Crosby Valve, LLC are the…

  2. Court case · South Carolina Court of Appeals · April 5, 2023 · in the opinion

    Glenn v. 3M Co. (2023)

    …Inc., f/k/a Daniel Construction Company, Inc.; Fluor Daniel Services Corporation; Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation; General Electric Company; Goodyear Tire & Rubber; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Grinnell LLC, f/k/a Grinnell Corp., f/k/a ITT…

  3. Court case · Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · March 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Dias v. Fisher Controls Int'l (In re Hawaii State Asbestos Cases, 2017)

    …INC., individually and as successor by merger to THE NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, 10) GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., a New York corporation, 11) INGERSOLL RAND CO., individually and as successor-in-interest to ALDRICH…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Woolard v. Carrier Corporation (2020)

    …Mr. Woolard did not mention Foxboro at all during his deposition, and there is no indication that his general testimony covers instrument features specific to (and therefore capable of identifying) Foxboro products. A second fact witness…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …this work, on its own, leaves only the general possibility that Covil insulation was likewise present. Plaintiffs next argue that Mr. Vinson worked in close proximity to Covil employees who were installing or maintaining insulation. The…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …the insulation at the RJ Reynolds plant," he answered that he did not "recall exactly who was working" and testified only that Daniel employees were general contractors who "did all kind of different jobs." (ECF No…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 23, 2015 · in the opinion

    Hernandez-Vega v. Fisher Controls Int'l (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)

    …early 1960s; and that any packing sold by Fisher for use with its valves was pre-sized. Arguments Fisher maintains that this court lacks both general and specific jurisdiction. This argument was not waived, Fisher asserts…

  8. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

    …the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)

    …1979, testified that, in his role as a general foreman at the Fiber Industries facility, he ordered\[6\] insulation material from Covil because Daniel International "had a contract to buy \[insulation\] through Covil." (ECF No. 208…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)

    …he was "pretty sure" there were "some Anchor\[ \]" valves there. (See ECF No. 312-1 at 23.) As a general matter, Mr. Draughn testified that "if a valve needed replacing" a supervisor "could send \[a mechanic…