Search

• Organization: DeZurik, Inc. ×
• Organization: I.U. North America, Inc. ×
• Clear filters

6 results for “General Electric”

1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021

   Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

   Darlene Data sued many companies in her own right and as executrix of her husband Michael Data's estate. Mr. Data served in the Navy aboard the USS Newport News from 1969 to 1973. He later worked at Mesta Machine and then at the West Pittsburgh…

2. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion

   Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

   There the canon avoids not contradiction but the superfluity of a specific provision that is swallowed by the general one, "violat\[ing\] the cardinal rule that, if possible, effect shall be given to every clause and…

3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007 · in the opinion

   Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)

   …applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent with his or her assertion in a previous action, if…

4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion

   Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

   …requirements of predominance and superiority. In In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation, 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.) \[Hereinafter GM Trucks\], cert. denied sub nom. General Motors Corp. v…

5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

   Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)

   …approach a situation to which the term judicial estoppel is applicable. ¶ 28 The doctrine of judicial estoppel holds that "\[a\]s a general rule, a party to an action is estopped from assuming a position inconsistent…

6. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

   Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

   …the general duty of care includes a duty to warn when the manufacturer "knows or has reason to know" that its product "is or is likely to be dangerous for the use for which it is…