7 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)
… Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue, Removal and Transfer Worksites: General Electric building, 32nd and Chestnut Streets; U.S.S. Cambria; General Electric; office building at 32nd and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia electronics officer and subsequently communications…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 15, 2022 · in the opinion
Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2022)
Nevertheless, there are two exceptions to the general rule of nonliability—the \retained control' exception and the \peculiar risk' exception. Plaintiff argues that both exceptions apply, or at least that there are genuine disputes of material…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 16, 2022 · in the opinion
Gay v. AO Smith Corp. (2022)
…to products containing asbestos. (ECF Nos. 1-1, 1-2). Defendant General Electric Company removed the case to this Court on the basis of federal enclave and federal officer jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 31, 2012 · in the opinion
Thurmon v. Scapa Waycross (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2012)
…Plaintiffs named forty entities as defendants including Scapa Waycross, Warren Pumps and Honeywell International. Defendant General Electric removed the action to federal court on April 29, 2011. It was then transferred to MDL 875 on May…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 15, 2016 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2016)
…Wheeler Energy Corporation, Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC (individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.), General Electric Company, Goulds Pumps, Inc., The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company d/b/a A&P Supermarkets, Honeywell International…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2012)
…the order of November 1, 2011, denied Pennsylvania Electric's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. As a general rule, a magistrate judge cannot "determine" a motion for judgment on the pleadings. See 28 U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014
Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)
…not make clear which defendants were sued in which counts, the court dismissed it without prejudice and ordered an amended complaint by May 9, 2014. It also noted general personal jurisdiction standards for a later motion.