24 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 12, 2010
Bush v. Eaton Corporation (2010)
Oretha Mae Bush sued Eaton Corporation, its plant supervisor James Kinsner, and several other companies in Kentucky state court. She alleged negligence and strict liability for exposing her to asbestos fibers and causing mesothelioma. She died in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2016
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
Charles Arbogast, Jr., and his wife Barbara sued twenty-seven companies, alleging that as manufacturers or distributors of various products they exposed him to asbestos and caused his mesothelioma. The complaint raised strict liability, negligence,…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 15, 2014
Estate OF Gregovich v. Auer Steel & Heating Supply (2014)
George Gregovich alleged that asbestos from products made or supplied by sixteen defendants caused his mesothelioma. He died about eighteen months after filing suit, and his estate and a guardian of his person and estate continued the case. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016
George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
…County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2019
Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2019)
…Worksites: General Electric building, 32nd and Chestnut Streets; USS Cambria; General Electric building at 32nd and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia Navy service aboard the USS Cambria USS Cambria 1964-1967; worked at General Electric property General Electric…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion
Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)
…Speck was to any work done on or around a General Electric product or product of another defendant\[,\]" and has "no idea" about the quantity of asbestos fibers to which Speck may have been exposed by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · April 20, 2009 · in the opinion
Hamrick v. A & I Company (2009)
…a Durametallic Corp. and GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC f/k/a Garlock, Inc. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and GOODRICH CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to Goodrich-Gulf Chemical, Inc. f/k/a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)
…worked on: Cutler-Hammer, Squire D., Siemens, Ellis, Allen-Bradley, Westinghouse, and General Electric. Id. at 101:8-22. Eaton has liability for Cutler-Hammer products. \[See ECF No. 384 p.2\]. Watson testified that he…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)
…under submission. DONE and ORDERED. \[1\] Plaintiff's complaint also named CBS Corporation (f/k/a Viacom, Inc.), DAP Products, Inc., General Electric Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, RT Vanderbilt Company…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)
… 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)
…causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · March 31, 2021
LaFRENTZ v. Lockheed Martin Corporation (2021)
The court denied 3M and General Dynamics' request for an adverse inference jury instruction for spoliation, but granted a lesser remedy: a limited jury instruction describing the unanswered preservation request and the burial of the lung…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 26, 2016
Boyd v. Boeing Company (2016)
The court denied Lockheed Martin's and General Dynamics' motions to reconsider the order allowing plaintiffs to add them as defendants after the amendment deadline, and denied their motion to strike them from the amended complaint…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2019
Temperino v. Amchem Prods. (2019)
…cigarettes a day for about 37 years. Honda moved for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff could not prove general or specific causation. Several other defendants asked the court to bar plaintiff's medical experts and, if successful…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · March 23, 2023
Riegler v. Carlisle Companies, Incorporated (2023)
…Staggs's specific causation opinion, and granted in part and denied in part the motions to exclude: Ewing's opinion and Staggs's general causation opinion were admitted. Under Rule 702, a medical expert's specific…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 9, 2013 · in the opinion
Williams v. Lockheed Martin Corp. (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2013)
…like opposing counsel talking to employees of his clients and that he holds himself to the same standard. He chooses as a general rule not to speak to employees of opposing counsel's clients. July 15…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion
Colvin v. Eaton Corporation (2019)
…in which the party responds but the response is incomplete or otherwise objectionable. Rules Commentary at 436-37.\[3\] As a general matter, the first step in obtaining a judicial resolution of a discovery dispute is…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Adams v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2005)
…Earth, including consideration of the chemistry of its constituent materials. These general definitions indicate that knowledge or understanding of chemical compositions and compounds is required in the scientific specialties of geology and geochemistry. Considering Dr. De…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · September 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2021)
…as already mentioned, Rule 26 provides two exceptions to the general rule that a party may not obtain discovery from another party's consulting expert: "(i) as provided in Rule 35(b); or (ii) on showing…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…however, must be reasonable, that is they must "indicate the probable, as distinguished from a possible cause." Briner v. General Motors Corporation, Ky., 461 S.W.2d 99, 101 (1970). Id. at 872-73. More recently…