No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

29 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · November 12, 2010

    Bush v. Eaton Corporation (2010)

    Oretha Mae Bush sued Eaton Corporation, its plant supervisor James Kinsner, and several other companies in Kentucky state court. She alleged negligence and strict liability for exposing her to asbestos fibers and causing mesothelioma. She died in…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2016

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    Charles Arbogast, Jr., and his wife Barbara sued twenty-seven companies, alleging that as manufacturers or distributors of various products they exposed him to asbestos and caused his mesothelioma. The complaint raised strict liability, negligence,…

  3. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 15, 2014

    Estate OF Gregovich v. Auer Steel & Heating Supply (2014)

    George Gregovich alleged that asbestos from products made or supplied by sixteen defendants caused his mesothelioma. He died about eighteen months after filing suit, and his estate and a guardian of his person and estate continued the case. The…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 16, 2016

    George v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …County state court. Even assuming consent-by-registration survives Daimler, Pennsylvania's registration statute limits general jurisdiction to acts occurring during the period of registration, so a registration that began after the alleged injury does not…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · April 5, 2024 · in the opinion

    Speck v. CBS Corporation (2024)

    …Speck was to any work done on or around a General Electric product or product of another defendant\[,\]" and has "no idea" about the quantity of asbestos fibers to which Speck may have been exposed by…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)

    …worked on: Cutler-Hammer, Squire D., Siemens, Ellis, Allen-Bradley, Westinghouse, and General Electric. Id. at 101:8-22. Eaton has liability for Cutler-Hammer products. \[See ECF No. 384 p.2\]. Watson testified that he…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 31, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …in California, asked to be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed that it was not subject to general jurisdiction in Washington because it was not incorporated or headquartered there. On specific jurisdiction, the…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 22, 2019

    Young v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiff's proof; conflicting expert affidavits on general and specific causation raise issues of fact for trial, and plaintiffs need only show facts from which liability may reasonably…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 20, 2019

    Temperino v. Amchem Prods. (2019)

    …cigarettes a day for about 37 years. Honda moved for summary judgment, arguing plaintiff could not prove general or specific causation. Several other defendants asked the court to bar plaintiff's medical experts and, if successful…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · April 9, 2020

    Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2020)

    …can support specific causation. Where the trial court effectively apportioned 0% to settling defendants who were left off the verdict sheet, General Obligations Law § 15-108 offsets are computed by the aggregate method. Causation; Product Identification…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 17, 2017

    Hodjera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2017)

    …employees or agents in Washington. The plaintiffs argued that WCD sold talc to Johnson & Johnson for nationwide distribution in cosmetic products. The court found no general jurisdiction, which the plaintiffs did not dispute. On specific jurisdiction…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · April 9, 2014

    Hasenberg v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2014)

    …not make clear which defendants were sued in which counts, the court dismissed it without prejudice and ordered an amended complaint by May 9, 2014. It also noted general personal jurisdiction standards for a later motion.

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · March 23, 2023

    Riegler v. Carlisle Companies, Incorporated (2023)

    …Staggs's specific causation opinion, and granted in part and denied in part the motions to exclude: Ewing's opinion and Staggs's general causation opinion were admitted. Under Rule 702, a medical expert's specific…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 21, 2019

    Hernandez v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …plaintiff's proof; it must make a prima facie showing that its product could not have contributed to the illness, and conflicting expert evidence on general and specific causation raises fact issues. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · February 26, 2019

    Shanahan v. Kolmar Laboratories, Inc. (2019)

    …non-diverse defendant in state court; under New York's lenient pleading standard, general allegations of manufacture and a disputed contract-specifications defense did not meet that burden. Venue, Removal and Transfer; Trial Procedure and Discovery

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Branson v. American International Industries (2016)

    …defense: We are of opinion that the privilege is of such a nature that it must be asserted at latest before the expiration of the period allotted for entering a general appearance and challenging the merits…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 4, 2019 · in the opinion

    Colvin v. Eaton Corporation (2019)

    …in which the party responds but the response is incomplete or otherwise objectionable. Rules Commentary at 436-37.\[3\] As a general matter, the first step in obtaining a judicial resolution of a discovery dispute is…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · December 21, 2015 · in the opinion

    Viera v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2015)

    …8, 2008). However, the movant must identify material witnesses and supply a general description of what their testimony will cover. Steck, 2015 WL 3767445, at [\3] (citation omitted). Defendants report that they are likely to call…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · March 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kirkwood v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2020)

    …avoid jurisdiction." In re Nazi Era Cases, 153 F. App'x at 823. While product line successor liability\[2\] is an exception to the general rule of successor non-liability, "no court, appears to have addressed ..…