Search

• Organization: Elliott Company ×
• Organization: Ingersoll-Rand Company ×
• Clear filters

10 results for “Ford Motor Company”

1. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion

   Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)

   …J., dissenting). In some cases, it has proven difficult to apply. See, e.g., Stockton v. Ford Motor Company, No. W2016-01175-COA-R3-CV, 2017 WL 2021760, at [\12]-15 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed May…

2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 30, 2018 · in the opinion

   MacCormack v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2018)

   …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

   Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)

   …formulated. These inferences cannot be based merely on speculation, but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App. 4th 1115, 1141 (2002)…

4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2009 · in the opinion

   Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

   …which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…

5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

   Merrill v. Leslie Controls, Inc. (2009)

   …which makes them better able to insure that the component is suitable for their specific applications. (Springmeyer v. Ford Motor Co. (1998) 60 Cal.App.4th 1541, 1554 \[71 Cal.Rptr.2d 190\].) Liability of a…

6. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

   Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

   …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion

   MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)

   …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion

   Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)

   …Court, E.D. Louisiana. Cary Gomez, Chucky R. Gomez, Norma C. Gomez, Brittany G. Ford & Chance J. Gomez, Plaintiffs, represented by Damon R. Pourciau, Ardoin Law Firm, Scott Michael Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua LLC & Stephanie Moore Hartman…

9. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · November 16, 2011 · in the opinion

   Gordon v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2011)

   …gasket from a vehicle on one occasion, when he overhauled a 1957 Ford.\[14\] He could not identify any other specific occasion where he had used a Victor gasket, nor was he able to identify the…

10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 9, 2015 · in the opinion

    Thomasson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …NJ, for Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. Christopher J. Keale, Esq., SEGWICK LLP, Newark, NJ, for Defendants Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. f/k/a Borg-Warner Corporation. Christopher S. Kozak, Esq., LANDMAN CORSI BALLAINE & FORD PC…