No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls) and many other companies in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in January 2022, from asbestos exposure. He alleged he worked at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)

    Felton Robichaux sued Huntington Ingalls (Avondale) and many other defendants in Louisiana state court. He alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 as a carpenter and insulator.…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 6, 2016 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)

    …69" for "at least four months." (Pl.'s Ex. 4 at 11-14.)\[2\] The work was an overhaul of a General Electric fossil fuel turbine which required removal and reinstallation of insulation, including asbestos blankets…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion

    Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls (2022)

    …24, 2014). In Vedros, the plaintiff filed suit against multiple defendants in state court, and three defendants, General Electric, Foster-Wheeler, and Westinghouse, subsequently removed the case pursuant to the federal officer removal statute. Id. at…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · May 2, 2018 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau (2018)

    …or the distance that Daniel Ahnert worked from any asbestos. He characterized his "general" report as a "review of the industrial hygiene literature as it relates to asbestos"—"kind of a rundown of asbestos information. Id…

  6. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)

    …to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Ahnert v. Employers Insurance Company OF Wausau (2016)

    …of Daniel Ahnert, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU, PABST BREWING COMPANY, SPRINKMANN SONS CORPORATION, WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. 13-C-1456. January 7, 2016. United States District Court, E.D…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)

    …In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…

  9. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    Pepsi-Cola v. Employers Ins. Co. (2022)

    …was filed by Robert Gilbert of Latham & Watkins, LLP of Boston, Massachusetts, for Wisconsin Manufacturing & Commerce and Emerson Electric Company. A nonparty brief was filed by James A. Friedman of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. of Madison…

  10. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)

    As a general principle, a clause restricting assignment does not in any way limit the policyholder's power to make an assignment of the rights under the policy — consisting of the right to receive the proceeds…

  11. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    § 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. American Re-Insurance Company (2010)

    …pay "all sums" up to the policy limit, which the insured shall become liable to pay as damages, and not just for damages that occur during the policy period (Aerojet-General Corp. v Transport Indem. Co.…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    US Fid. & Guaranty Co. v. American Re-Ins. Co. (2012)

    …brevity, we presume familiarity with the case, and provide a general overview of the facts directly relevant to this appeal. The Underlying Asbestos Claims In the 1950s and 1960s, Western Asbestos was a company that sold…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · December 30, 2008 · in the opinion

    Continental Casualty Co. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau (2008)

    …early 1970s banning the use of asbestos-containing products. The subject insurance policies are 17 primary level comprehensive general liability (hereinafter referred to as CGL) policies that were issued by CNA to Keasbey between February 1970…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corporation (2009)

    …issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a pre-packaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 4, 2022 · in the opinion

    Stansbury v. McCARTY Corporation (2022)

    …1165 (5th Cir. 1989). There, the Fifth Circuit found that "federal question jurisdiction can only be obtained for claims regarding the LHWCA under the general federal question provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1331." Id. Accordingly…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2009)

    …issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a prepackaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19, 2002…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Perez v. Century Indemnity Co. (2024)

    …its van or stepped inside. We agree with plaintiffs that the brakes remained in Universal's possession as they lay untouched in the back of its van. (See General Casualty Co. of America v. Azteca Films…