No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …asbestos products in Indiana and California. He contends that the trial court erroneously split the cause of action into California and Indiana components, contrary to statements by our Supreme Court in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 18, 2003

    In re Kensington Intern. Ltd. (2003)

    Creditors in two of five asbestos-related Chapter 11 bankruptcies (Owens Corning and W.R. Grace) asked the Third Circuit for writs of mandamus. They wanted District Judge Alfred Wolin removed from the cases because of…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 13, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2005)

    …by definition, is an approximation and necessarily involves comparing a known or established quantum of data to the thing being estimated. The In re Owens Corning estimation provides a useful analog to this estimation. That estimation…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    … 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…