No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Illinois”

  1. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …Corp., 667 F.Supp. 1523, 1538 (S.D. Ga. 1983) (endeavoring to provide guidance "carefully, methodically and with an eye toward practical solutions"); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 138 N.J. 437, 477-78…

  2. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    … Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America, supra, 667 F.2d 1044 n.19, 1047 n.25; Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., supra, 138 N.J. 457. For these reasons, we are persuaded…

  3. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2008 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2008)

    …Mogul Products, Inc.(FMP). FMP now owes to Pneumo Abex the indemnity that was originally provided by Wagner in the 1994 APA. The obligations that arise from the relationship with Cooper are two-fold. The first…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2005)

    (See Testimony of Hans Weill, M.D., in Owens Corning v. Credit Suisse First Boston, No. 04-CV-905 (D. Del.) 1/18/2005 at 45-48 (hereinafter "Weill Tr. at \_\_\_").)\[4\] Dr. Weill has been…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …Inc., 151 F.3d 297 (5th Cir.1998). Owens Corning, a major asbestos manufacturer, sought to create a "National Settlement Program" outside the judicial system by entering private contracts with plaintiffs' firms that would have settled…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …than one insurer will be triggered. Because each insurer is fully liable, and because Keene cannot collect more than it owes in damages, the issue of dividing insurance obligations arises. The only logical resolution of this…