No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

40 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 2, 2004

    Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2004)

    …not know of mesothelioma specifically. It reinstated liability for CertainTeed, Fibreboard and Flintkote, found no error as to Foster Wheeler and General Electric, and removed Gasket Holding. It upheld the damage awards. Exxon owed a virile…

  2. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 26, 2010 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. AJ Friedman Supply Co. (2010)

    …Bacon & Davis, Incorporated, Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Furino & Sons, Inc., Garlock, Inc., General Refractories, Co., General Electric Co., Georgia Pacific, Inc., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company and Goodyear Canada, Inc., Gorman-Rupp Company, Inc., Greene Tweed…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    RW Beckett Corp. v. Allianz Global Corp. (2020)

    …which was in effect from February 1, 1981, through February 1, 1984, included comprehensive general liability coverage. ECF Doc. 1-5 at 1, 37. The policy set an aggregate bodily injury limit of $500,000 and…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 23, 2023 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Exxon Chemical Louisiana, LLC (2023)

    …Successor-in-Interest to National Maintenance Corporation and Nichols Construction Company, Ameron International Corporation, and CBS Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation. NO. 2022 CA 1290. Judgment Rendered: June 23, 2023. Rehearing Denied July 20…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2020 · in the opinion

    Sabetian v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2020)

    …California Gas Leak Cases (2019) 7 Cal.5th 391, 397 \[247 Cal.Rptr.3d 632, 441 P.3d 881\].) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)

    …refinery, including Standard Oil of New Jersey's employee Paul Kuhl, who became general manager of the refinery. Soler testified as the person most qualified for the Chevron defendants in Sabetian v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 20, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2021)

    …391, 397; accord, Sabetian, supra, 57 Cal.App.5th at p. 1070.) "In general, each person has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances." (Regents, supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 619; accord…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2007

    Terrance v. Dow Chemical Company (2007)

    The court affirmed the judgment on the jury's $5,000,000 general damages verdict for the Terrance estate and surviving spouse against Exxon, and denied Exxon's JNOV, new trial and remittitur motions. Mesothelioma was…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983

    Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)

    …and multiple-level hearsay from a doctor's report, a general pamphlet and an unsupported 'admission' that brake linings contain asbestos does not supply it. Medical opinions based on statistical studies can be substantial evidence of…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Hsieh v. Apache Deepwater, LLC (2021)

    2008) (citation omitted) ("When faced with general objections, the applicability of which to specific document requests is not explained further, this Court will not raise objections for the responding party, but instead will overrule the responding…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2007)

    Altimore or those "similarly situated" takes the focus off Exxon's knowledge of a general danger relative to the qualities of asbestos. By focusing on epidemiological studies, the majority fails to follow our earlier pronouncement that…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)

    …2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…

  14. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 3, 2008

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2008)

    …its conduct posed an extreme degree of risk. General knowledge of asbestos risk to employees was not evidence of knowledge of an extreme risk to employees' family members. Expert Testimony; Punitive Damages Worksites: Exxon Baytown refinery…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. McDERMOTT, Inc (2020)

    …inherent in the job. R. Doc. 449-2 at 19. In general, a premises owner has a duty to protect persons on the premises from the unreasonable risk of harm. Mundy v. Dep't of Health…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bourke v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2016)

    …56\] In Poche, the court began with the general premise that "\[a\] case that is initially nonremovable may become removable through the voluntary dismissal of nondiverse defendants."\[57\] All but one of the defendants—Eagle, Inc.…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kordestani v. ExxonMOBIL Oil Corporation (2016)

    …the in limine motion \operate\[s\] as a general demurrer to \[the\] complaint or a motion for judgment on the pleadings.' \[Citations.\] \Alternatively,' where such motions are granted \at the outset of trial with reference to…

  19. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …without the insurer's consent to the terms of settlement. Such terms again are a justifiable incident of the insurers' general right to manage the processing of claims; they reflect insurers' understandable interest in containing their…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 16, 2019 · in the opinion

    Epstein v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …Corporation is directed to serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on all remaining parties, the Trial Support Clerk located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119), and on the County Clerk…