No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

18 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 3, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …However, other options did exist at that time. Q. Okay. But General Electric certainly knew that was one of the options that would be used on these turbines, was asbestos-containing insulation? A. I'm sure…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    RW Beckett Corp. v. Allianz Global Corp. (2020)

    …which was in effect from February 1, 1981, through February 1, 1984, included comprehensive general liability coverage. ECF Doc. 1-5 at 1, 37. The policy set an aggregate bodily injury limit of $500,000 and…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  4. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983

    Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)

    …and multiple-level hearsay from a doctor's report, a general pamphlet and an unsupported 'admission' that brake linings contain asbestos does not supply it. Medical opinions based on statistical studies can be substantial evidence of…

  6. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    § 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)

    …2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 20, 2025 · in the opinion

    Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2025)

    …that transfers the insured's risk to First State even beyond the policy period as long as the same general conditions (occupational exposure to asbestos) are substantially the same as the conditions that occurred during the…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  10. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · January 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2007)

    …of asbestos claims including: (i) all of the Debtors' interest in asbestos insurance coverage provided in their general liability insurance (ii) 3,800,000 new shares of Congoleum Class A common stock (but only if the…

  11. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …without the insurer's consent to the terms of settlement. Such terms again are a justifiable incident of the insurers' general right to manage the processing of claims; they reflect insurers' understandable interest in containing their…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gea Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. v. First State Insurance Company (2023)

    …June 24, 2019) (the "Thornton Action"). Defendants, or their predecessors, issued certain primary or excess general liability policies (the "Policies") to GEA Mechanical's predecessor, Centrico, Inc. ("Centrico"),\[2\] covering various periods from May 15, 1979…

  13. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…

  14. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jeter v. Ameron International Corporation (2021)

    …L.L.C. ("Turner"). Turner filed a third-party demand against its comprehensive general liability insurers, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company ("FFIC") and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G"), seeking that they provide Turner…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 10, 1991 · in the opinion

    Force v. Director, Owcp, Dept. of Labor (1991)

    …S.Ct. at 2289, which "expressly creates a general right of reimbursement that obtains without regard to whether the employee's third-party recovery includes losses that are excluded from FECA coverage." Id. at 174, 104…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2009)

    …issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a prepackaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19, 2002…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…