No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    … Metropolitan Life Insurance; William B. March; and Union Carbide Corporation. In addition, in responses to requests for admissions that were read to the jury, plaintiffs admitted that Marline was exposed to asbestos-containing products manufactured or…

  2. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014 · in the opinion

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …This Court considers analogous case law. In the asbestos context, courts have found that where a company made a "calculated risk," it did not amount to an "expectation of damage."\[33\] In Union Carbide Corporation v.

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    Ruby Konstantin, executor for her late husband David Konstantin, sued the insurers of Tishman Liquidating Corporation. David Konstantin, a carpenter from 1974 to 1977, was allegedly exposed to asbestos on buildings and died in 2012 of…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    Ruby Konstantin, executor of the estate of David Konstantin, sued insurers of the Tishman companies and Resolute Management. Konstantin had died of mesothelioma after exposure to asbestos while working as a carpenter in buildings where Tishman…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Granite State Insurance Company 15) Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 16) Highlands Insurance Company 17) Insurance Company of North America 18) Lexington Insurance Company 19) National Surety Corporation 20) National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh…

  6. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    …contrary interpretation of Connecticut law. The second defect in the court's analysis is that it assumed that the parties intended to import the act's definition of the term "personal injury." See Commercial Union Ins…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jeter v. Ameron International Corporation (2021)

    …only be responsible within the terms of its policy for those damages arising out of the period the policy is in effect." Id., citing Norfolk Southern Corp. v. California Union Ins. Co., 02-0369, 02-0371…

  8. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …legal or financial effect on the objector after confirmation.\[50\] Unfortunately for this argument, the Supreme Court held in Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 530 U.S. 1, 120 S.Ct…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    RW Beckett Corp. v. Allianz Global Corp. (2020)

    …non-settling carriers from seeking equitable contribution, Ohio law may permit the non-settling carriers to seek another form of equitable relief: the settlement credit. Goodrich Corp. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 2008-Ohio-3200, at ¶…

  10. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)

    …four phases; subsequently, the court granted the motions for summary judgment filed by the defendant Government Employees Insurance Company and to dismiss filed by the defendant National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, and denied…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …Donald E. Santarelli, Washington, D. C., were on the brief for Commercial Union Insurance Companies, Amici Curiae urging remand for full consideration in Nos. 81-1179, 81-1180, 81-1181 and 81-1182. John Mahoney, Jr…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)

    …1965-66 policy year. Weyerhaeuser argues that the Court's analysis of which policy years were triggered should be guided by a 2000 Washington Supreme Court case — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. ("Weyerhaeuser II")…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 17, 2021 · in the opinion

    Covil Corporation v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. (2021)

    …such judicial involvement derives from Covil's status as a dissolved corporation in receivership and does not entitle the Zurich Settlement to absolute protection from production in litigation.\[8\] Allowing for limited disclosure under the circumstances…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · February 27, 1997 · in the opinion

    Sybron Transition v. Sec. Ins. Co. of Hartford (1997)

    …on its counterclaim. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. \[1\] Sybron Transition Corporation is Kerr's parent company. \[2\] Apparently, Security wanted Hartford to share in the defense…

  15. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …the brief, MaryKate J. Geary, West Hartford and Marianne May, pro hac vice, for the appellee-cross appellant (defendant Westport Insurance Corporation). Lawrence D. Mason, pro hac vice, with whom were John A. Lee, pro hac…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …Combustion Engineering and Global Technologies. Furthermore, the trusts appear to have fulfilled Congress's expectation that they would serve the interests of both current and future asbestos claimants and corporations saddled with asbestos liability. In particular…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …provision, the general choice of law rules of the forum state, Illinois, control. (Thieme v. Union Labor Life Insurance Co. (1956), 12 Ill. App.2d 110, 138 N.E.2d 857.) In insurance coverage actions, like…