No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · December 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Brezonick v. AW Chesteron Company (2015)

    …to be pasteurized. A lot of them had to be changed. Just general maintenance of the whole machine. Repacking required John to remove old gaskets and rope packing from valves, clean the valves, fit new gaskets…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · April 24, 2020 · in the opinion

    RW Beckett Corp. v. Allianz Global Corp. (2020)

    …which was in effect from February 1, 1981, through February 1, 1984, included comprehensive general liability coverage. ECF Doc. 1-5 at 1, 37. The policy set an aggregate bodily injury limit of $500,000 and…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2017

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …52 and topic 40 (pre-1972 only) and denying the general dust and post-employment topics. Rule 30(b)(6) topics must be relevant and proportional; general 'dust' topics were cumulative of the asbestos-specific topics…

  5. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 1983

    Skip Fordyce, Inc. v. Workers'comp. Appeals BD. (1983)

    …and multiple-level hearsay from a doctor's report, a general pamphlet and an unsupported 'admission' that brake linings contain asbestos does not supply it. Medical opinions based on statistical studies can be substantial evidence of…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 2, 2008 · in the opinion

    Weyerhaeuser Company v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (2008)

    …2008) WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY, Third-Party Plaintiff, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN, and OLD REPUBLIC…

  8. Court case · Connecticut Supreme Court · March 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2019)

    …and accidental" exception to pollution exclusion was intended to preclude coverage for gradually occurring pollution, "so that only a temporally abrupt release of pollutants would be covered as an exception to the general pollution exclusion"). Indeed…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 25, 2017 · in the opinion

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …deMahy & Angela Jacketti O'Brien, Louisiana Department of Justice - Office of Attorney General. RULING AND ORDER ERIN WILDER-DOOMES, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is a Motion for Destructive Testing\[1\] filed by defendant Pilkington North…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 25, 2020 · in the opinion

    Textron, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company (2020)

    …both parties) to obtain a declaration that Travelers owed a duty to defend and indemnify in the Esters action under a series of Commercial General Liability (CGL) policies issued to Textron by Travelers from January 1…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)

    …1103.) Even assuming Dr. Horn is correct as to the cause of mesothelioma in general, plaintiffs had the burden to prove that exposure to asbestos-containing materials at Rossmoor was a substantial factor in contributing to…

  12. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Minnesota · October 15, 2005 · in the opinion

    In re Api, Inc. (2005)

    …without the insurer's consent to the terms of settlement. Such terms again are a justifiable incident of the insurers' general right to manage the processing of claims; they reflect insurers' understandable interest in containing their…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 21, 2017 · in the opinion

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …represented by Angela Jacketti O'Brien, Louisiana Department of Justice - Office of Attorney General. RULING AND ORDER ERIN WILDER-DOOMES, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Plaintiffs' Second Revised Joint Rule 25(a)(1) Motion for…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…

  15. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jeter v. Ameron International Corporation (2021)

    …L.L.C. ("Turner"). Turner filed a third-party demand against its comprehensive general liability insurers, Fireman's Fund Insurance Company ("FFIC") and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G"), seeking that they provide Turner…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · July 10, 1991 · in the opinion

    Force v. Director, Owcp, Dept. of Labor (1991)

    …S.Ct. at 2289, which "expressly creates a general right of reimbursement that obtains without regard to whether the employee's third-party recovery includes losses that are excluded from FECA coverage." Id. at 174, 104…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion

    Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)

    …2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…