No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 3, 2022 · in the opinion

    Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2022)

    …However, other options did exist at that time. Q. Okay. But General Electric certainly knew that was one of the options that would be used on these turbines, was asbestos-containing insulation? A. I'm sure…

  2. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2017 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Company, Inc. v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (2017)

    …in other jurisdictions, that a pollution exclusion clause in a comprehensive general liability policy bars coverage only for traditional environmental pollution such as oil spills or the dumping of hazardous waste into the natural environment. Id.…

  3. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 30, 2016 · in the opinion

    RT Vanderbilt Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. (2016)

    …that\] would lie between arduous and Sisyphean." That commentary, however, was made not with respect to the general retroactive application of allocation rules but, rather, in the specific context of the court's determination that the…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  5. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…

  6. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)

    As a general principle, a clause restricting assignment does not in any way limit the policyholder's power to make an assignment of the rights under the policy — consisting of the right to receive the proceeds…

  7. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    § 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 20, 2025 · in the opinion

    Sentilles v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2025)

    …that transfers the insured's risk to First State even beyond the policy period as long as the same general conditions (occupational exposure to asbestos) are substantially the same as the conditions that occurred during the…

  9. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey · January 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2007)

    …of asbestos claims including: (i) all of the Debtors' interest in asbestos insurance coverage provided in their general liability insurance (ii) 3,800,000 new shares of Congoleum Class A common stock (but only if the…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gea Mechanical Equipment US, Inc. v. First State Insurance Company (2023)

    …June 24, 2019) (the "Thornton Action"). Defendants, or their predecessors, issued certain primary or excess general liability policies (the "Policies") to GEA Mechanical's predecessor, Centrico, Inc. ("Centrico"),\[2\] covering various periods from May 15, 1979…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Congoleum Corp. (2009)

    …issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a prepackaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19, 2002…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…