No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    James Scribner, a Navy veteran who later worked for a power company, developed mesothelioma and died in November 1995. He had sued, and his widow and children continued the case, against John Crane, Garlock and others. Scribner testified that in the…

  3. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York · April 19, 2006 · in the opinion

    In re Dana Corp. (2006)

    …for the Asbestos Claimants may inevitably lead to duplicative efforts in these cases. Other Considerations Unlike the Johns-Manville and Owens Corning cases, these Debtors were not driven into bankruptcy by the magnitude of its asbestos…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

    …IL, James D. Miller, King & Spalding, Washington, DC, Philip McWeeny, David L. Gray, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Toledo, Ohio, for Owens-Illinois, Inc.-Amicus Curiae. Robert G. Vial, Dallas, Texas, Gordon S. Rather, Jr., Little Rock, Arkansas…

  5. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 1997 · in the opinion

    Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor (1997)

    …Maynard Ungerman; for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America by Jeffrey Robert White and Howard F. Twiggs; for Law Professors by Charles Silver and Samuel Issacharoff; for Owens-Illinois, Inc., by James D. Miller; and…

  6. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 13, 2016 · in the opinion

    Murray v. Dana Companies (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …that Dana has no offices in Rhode Island, no employees in Rhode Island, owns no property and leases no property in Rhode Island, sells no products in Rhode Island, and is not registered or authorized to…