95 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 5
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 22, 1999
Miller v. Foster Wheeler Co. (1999)
Creighton Miller, as administrator of the estates of seamen William Blecker and Willie Holmes, sued a large group of manufacturers and shipping companies. Blecker was diagnosed with mesothelioma in August 1989 and died in October 1992. Holmes was…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · March 23, 1993
Miller v. American President Lines, Ltd. (1993)
Maurice Moline, a retired seaman, sued several shipowners over his exposure to asbestos while working on their ships. After he died of mesothelioma in 1989, his estate's administrator continued the case under the Jones Act and general maritime law.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · July 16, 1998
Harder v. ACandS, Inc. (1998)
Oscar Harder worked from 1956 to 1989 as a utility worker for Iowa Public Service. His duties included maintenance at several power plants, among them overhauling General Electric steam turbines. Each overhaul began with removing thermal asbestos…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001
Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)
Loyd Herring worked for Cummins Engine Company in Columbus, Indiana, from 1942 until he retired in 1978, and the opinion says he was exposed there to various forms of asbestos and asbestos-containing products. He was diagnosed with malignant…
-
Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998
Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)
The widows of three men, Merel Beaudrie, Willie B. Smith and Ralph Wright, sued asbestos manufacturers as personal representatives of their husbands' estates. Each claimed the husband died of mesothelioma from asbestos exposure during his…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · October 5, 2004 · in the opinion
Chicano v. General Electric Company (2004)
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 619-21 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999) (applying the heeding presumption). "\[I\]n cases where warnings or instructions are required to make a product non-defective and a warning…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defendant" bars recovery where such misuse proximately caused the injury. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 721 n.14 (4th Cir…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 10, 2014 · in the opinion
White v. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana (2014)
…So.2d 1058, writ denied, 07-2042 (La.12/14/07), 970 So.2d 534) and $3 million (Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 03-0248 (La. App. 1st Cir.4/2/04), 878 So.2d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)
…the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion
Roussell v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion
Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)
…dust." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506 (1996); see also id. at 506 n.2 (describing the medical field's study of mesothelioma and conclusions about its relation to asbestos); Owens-Illinois…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
…sought, or otherwise discovered his illness or injuries, prior to Proposition 51's effective date of June 4, 1986." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 525, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)
…determine whether an exposure was causal. See, e.g., Code § 8.01-249(4) (addressing the statute of limitations for latent mesothelioma cases); see also Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 243 Va. 128, 143-44…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010 · in the opinion
Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)
…is \[a\] significant and substantial contributing factor to the \[plaintiff's\] asbestos related disease." Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning, 843 A.2d 410, 414 (Pa.Super.2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · October 26, 2015 · in the opinion
Brown v. Kentucky Utilities Company (2015)
…Court relied upon the reasoning and holding in Carneal to sever and remand similar claims in other cases. See, e.g., Bean v. Owens Corning Fiberglas, No. 5:01-CV-249-R, Order (W.D. Ky…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion
Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)
…Ct. App. 2016); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 456 (Ala. 1992) (finding summary judgment was inappropriate where evidence showed the decedent worked close to where asbestos products were used and expert…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2012)
…asserted the government contractor defense as a colorable defense. Hagen, 739 F. Supp. 2d at 776 (citing Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998)); see also Jefferson Cnty. v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)
…does not equal absolute liability. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994.) Because all Ford offered the jury was a "vague impression that \[the\] other products \[were\] somewhat similar," because Ford…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · February 3, 2015 · in the opinion
Ahnert v. Brand Insulation Inc. (2015)
…on the merits by a court with jurisdiction;" and (3) an "identity of the causes of action in the two suits." Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 230 Wis.2d 212, 601 N.W.2d 627…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion
In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)
… 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…