No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · January 25, 1985

    Rocco v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1985)

    The Third Circuit affirmed the verdicts against Johns-Manville and Pittsburgh Corning and the denial of new trial and JNOV, but held that payments from non-joint-tortfeasor (Group A) settlements should not reduce the verdict…

  2. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · February 20, 1981

    Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos (1981)

    Edwin Nolan, Jr., worked as an asbestos insulator from 1941 to 1973, apart from military service from 1943 to 1946. In 1975 he sued asbestos product makers in Cook County, Illinois, on a strict liability theory, alleging inadequate warnings. He…

  3. Court case · Oklahoma Supreme Court · September 22, 1987

    Case v. Fibreboard Corp. (1987)

    Bobbie Edwin Case and his wife Eva sued twenty-two asbestos product makers in federal court in Oklahoma. Mr. Case said he was a sheet metal worker in Oklahoma from 1949 on and was exposed to asbestos-containing products made and sold by the…

  4. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 3, 1982

    Staiano v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1982)

    Carman Staiano sued a group of asbestos product makers, including Johns-Manville, Owens-Corning and Celotex, for personal injuries. His wife, Rita, sued for loss of consortium. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos dust from…

  5. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · April 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Kinseth v. WEIL-McLAIN Company (2017)

    …recovery under the statute of repose, as the products were permanent additions to real property. See Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90, 91 (Iowa 1996). Therefore, we reverse the district court…

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · February 27, 1986

    Kisor v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    The Ninth Circuit reversed the judgment entered on a jury verdict for Owens-Illinois and remanded for a new trial, ruling for Kisor's estate, because the district court wrongly admitted evidence of the manufacturer's…