No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · October 28, 1981

    Fearson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    Rita Fearson, as administratrix, sued Johns-Manville and other asbestos product companies after her husband Joseph Fearson died of lung cancer in 1979 at age 57. He had worked as an asbestos insulation installer in the District of Columbia from 1936…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · July 30, 1982

    Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    Henry Wilson worked as an insulation worker at construction sites in the Washington, D.C. area from 1941. In February 1973 an x-ray showed he had mild asbestosis. In February 1978 he was diagnosed with mesothelioma, and he died in May 1978. In May…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota · January 11, 1982

    Bertrand v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    Eugene Bertrand, an insulator, sued Johns-Manville and many other asbestos product makers in federal court in Minnesota. He said he breathed asbestos dust while working with and near asbestos products and developed pulmonary fibrosis and other lung…

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 2, 1994 · in the opinion

    Atkinson v. Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …for Combustion Engineering. Edwin A. Ellinghausen III, David L. Tolin, for Fibreboard Corporation. Louis G. Lemle for Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. James L. Pate, Ben Louis Mayeaux, for M.H. Detrick Co. [\386] Kenneth R. Spears…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1982 · in the opinion

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …Insulating, UNARCO Industries, Nicolette, and Celotex. Six of the present appellants were parties to Borel: Pittsburgh Corning, Armstrong Cork, Phillip Carey, Ruberoid, Johns-Manville, and Fibreboard Paper. Owens Corning Fiberglass, Standard Asbestos Mfg. & Insulating, UNARCO, and…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · May 28, 1992 · in the opinion

    Cole v. Celotex Corp. (1992)

    …contribution claims, the trial judge in Champagne relied upon the Fifth Circuit's holding in Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 528 So.2d 716 (La.App. 5th Cir.), writ denied, 531…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · March 13, 1981

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    This opinion covers fifty-seven consolidated asbestos cases in the Marshall division of the Eastern District of Texas. The plaintiffs included insulation workers, pipefitters, carpenters and factory workers, and the defendants were asbestos product…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · September 11, 1986

    Vigiolto v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)

    Antoinette Vigiolto sued several asbestos product manufacturers after her husband, Christopher Vigiolto, died of pleural mesothelioma in 1981. He served in the Navy from 1943 to 1945 on two ships, and she alleged he inhaled asbestos dust and fibers…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002

    Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)

    …sued its liability and property insurers in Connecticut federal court, seeking a declaration that its policies covered what it spent to deal with lead and asbestos in buildings it owns. Several insurers moved for summary judgment…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · May 4, 1978

    Ins. Co. of No. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations (1978)

    …during a claimant's exposure must share indemnity and defense costs by years of coverage. Forty-Eight must bear shares for years it was uninsured, and no insurer owes more than the highest single-year limit.

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · May 21, 2019 · in the opinion

    Zurich American v. Insurance Co. of North America (2019)

    …pollution exclusion applies in this case, then INA owes no coverage for the Cotter suit and ZAIC could not seek contribution or subrogation against INA as a matter of law. ZAIC responds that INA failed to…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · October 1, 1981 · in the opinion

    Keene Corp. v. Ins. Co. of North America (1981)

    …than one insurer will be triggered. Because each insurer is fully liable, and because Keene cannot collect more than it owes in damages, the issue of dividing insurance obligations arises. The only logical resolution of this…