13 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 30, 2014
Barnes v. Foster Wheeler Corp. (2014)
The district court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment and dismissed all claims against GE with prejudice, because plaintiffs offered no admissible evidence that Barnes was exposed to an asbestos product made or supplied…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 17, 2011 · in the opinion
Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2011)
…Plaintiff argues that either Virginia's General Assembly was aware of what Plaintiff sees as a national trend in favor of adoption of the separate disease rule and embodied this trend when it amended Virginia's…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 16, 2011
Kiser v. AW Chesterton Co. (2011)
Phyllis Kiser, as executor of her husband Orvin Kiser, Sr.'s estate, brought a wrongful death suit in October 2010 against a group of companies whose asbestos-containing products were alleged to have caused his mesothelioma. He was diagnosed with…
-
Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Brochu v. Aesys Technologies (2015)
…D & N Insulation Co.; Elliott Turbomachinery Co., Inc.; Fairbanks Morse Engines; Foster Wheeler Corp.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Homasote Co.; IMO Industries, Inc.…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 17, 2015 · in the opinion
McCloskey v. Cemline Corporation (2015)
…DECEASED, AND PATRICIA PARTNER, IN HER OWN RIGHT, Appellants, v. CEMLINE CORPORATION, CERRO WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC., THE LINCOLN ELECTRIC COMPANY, MADDEN BOILER WORKS, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., PPG AUTO GLASS…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 24, 1979 · in the opinion
Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos & Magnesia Materials Co. (1979)
…defective product. See Urie v. Thompson, 337 U.S. 163, 69 S.Ct. 1018, 11 A.L.R.2d 252; Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. Barker, 228 F.2d 842; Brush Beryllium Co. v. Meckley, 284…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…that "\[t\]he Trustees shall consult with the TAC and the Future Claimants' Representative (i) on the general implementation and administration of the Asbestos PI Trust; (ii) on the general implementation and administration of the TDP…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · June 16, 2011 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2011)
…they function together. This finding is supported by evidence of record, including testimony cited by Mt. McKinley which established that Corning's General Counsel and Rule 30(b)(6) witness, Vincent P. Hatton, could not specify…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · April 26, 1999 · in the opinion
Holmes v. ACandS, Inc. (1999)
…year discovery based statute of limitations applicable to product liability claims. The comprehensiveness of the medical malpractice act is evidence of the legislature's intent that it should prevail over the more general wrongful death statute…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 23, 1999 · in the opinion
Lambert v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (1999)
…we must address two issues. First, we must assess the general features of the type of incident involved to determine whether the incident had "a potentially disruptive impact on maritime commerce." Id. (quoting Sisson v. Ruby…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Pittsburgh Corning Corporation (2013)
…103:10-13 (Diggs). 68. Typically, the asbestos claims against PPG contained general products liability allegations, or allegations that might be interpreted in such a manner, asserted against all defendants, along with specific allegations about PPG…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · December 9, 1986 · in the opinion
In re Hawaii Federal Asbestos Cases (1986)
…Moreover the Hawaii Court of Appeals has held that the introduction of concepts of "unreasonableness" and "foreseeability" into products liability confuses the jury and equates strict liability with negligence. Boudreau v. General Elec. Co., 2 Haw…
-
Court case · Minnesota Court of Appeals · May 21, 2018 · in the opinion
Conda v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2018)
…causation experts were foundationally reliable and properly admitted" and that "those opinions established a prima facie case of general and specific causation using the legal standard established by the court when trial commenced." The district court…