No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 26, 1999

    Greenleaf v. Garlock, Inc. (1999)

    …so judgment for the Greenleafs against Garlock and Owens Corning must be entered at the state amount. It also ordered a new trial on Garlock's and Owens Corning's crossclaims against the non-appearing defendants…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010

    Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)

    …the FTCA's discretionary function exception is an immunity from suit, not a determination that the government owes no duty or is not at fault, so fault may be apportioned to the Navy under Proposition 51…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · June 9, 1999 · in the opinion

    Harder v. ACandS (1999)

    …were not permanent additions to or betterment of real property before or during their attachment to duct work and boilers. See Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90, 91-92 (Iowa 1996)…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · July 8, 1988 · in the opinion

    Knox v. AC & S, Inc. (1988)

    …Co., 476 N.E.2d 84, 85 (Ind.1985) and the decision in Walters v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 781 F.2d 570 (7th Cir. 1986), finding that Indiana's discovery rule applies in asbestos cases…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …transfer of an insolvent defendant's non-cash settlement obligation to the non-settling defendants under the present circumstances follows the ruling in McNair v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 890 F.2d 753 (5th Cir.1989).

  6. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · August 17, 1998 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1998)

    …Corning's financial resources or insurance coverage or evidence of other asbestos damage awards of any kind which Pittsburgh Corning had paid or as to which final judgments were outstanding against it. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1982 · in the opinion

    Hardy v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

    …Insulating, UNARCO Industries, Nicolette, and Celotex. Six of the present appellants were parties to Borel: Pittsburgh Corning, Armstrong Cork, Phillip Carey, Ruberoid, Johns-Manville, and Fibreboard Paper. Owens Corning Fiberglass, Standard Asbestos Mfg. & Insulating, UNARCO, and…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion

    Sampey v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Trust (1992)

    …720, 101 Ill.Dec. 193, 195, 498 N.E.2d 375, 377; see also Wolford v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1988), 176 Ill.App.3d 312, 314, 125 Ill.Dec. 563, 564, 530 N.E.2d…

  10. Company or organization · People and organizations

    Fibreboard Corporation

    …that held asbestos insulation makers strictly liable for failing to warn insulators. Owens Corning bought Fibreboard in 1997, and its asbestos claims are now paid by the Fibreboard sub-account of the Owens Corning/Fibreboard trust.

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · August 19, 1986

    Menne v. Celotex Corp. (1986)

    …at his workplace and caused his disease, and awarded $2,500,000. The jury found for Keene and Owens-Illinois. The four losing defendants asked for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial or a reduced…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)

    …for summary judgment, plaintiffs have either moved to dismiss or settled with the following defendants which were party to the Joint Defendants' motion: FMC Corporation,\[20\] Ingersoll-Rand Company,\[21\] McCarty Corporation,\[22\] Owens-Illinois, Inc.…